Skip to main content

Assessing Ground Truth of Glandular Tissue

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNIP,volume 4046)

Abstract

In medical image analysis a ground truth to compare results against is of vital importance. This ground truth is often obtained from human experts. The aim of this paper is to discuss the problem related to the use of markings made by an expert panel. As a partial solution, we propose a method to relate markings to each other in order to establish levels of agreement. By using this method we can assess the performance of, for instance, segmentation algorithms.

Keywords

  • Ground Truth
  • Segmentation Algorithm
  • Domain Expert
  • Human Expert
  • Glandular Tissue

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borgefors, G.: Distance transformations in digital images. Comput. Vision, Graphics, Image Processing 34, 344–371 (1986)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Brink, A.D., Pendock, N.E.: Minimum Cross-Entropy Threshold Selection. Pattern Recognition 29(1), 179–188 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Bromiley, P.A., Courtney, P., Thacker, N.A.: A case study in the use of ROC curves for algorithm design. In: The British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gual-Arnau, X., Ibáñez-Gual, M.V., Lliso, F., Roldán, S.: Organ contouring for prostate cancer: Interobserver and internal organ motion variability. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 29, 639–647 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, C.H., Lee, C.K.: Minimum Cross-Entropy Thresholding. Pattern Recognition 26(4), 617–625 (1993)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Masek, M.: Hierarchical Segmentation Of Mammograms Based On Pixel Intensity. PhD thesis, Centre for Intelligent Processing Systems, School of Electrical, Electronic, and Computer Engineering, The University of Western Australia (February 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mukhdoomi, A.: On the problem of segementing fibro-glandular tissue in mammograms. Master’s thesis, UMNAD 619/06 Umeå University, Department of Computing Science (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olsén, C.: Automatic breast border extraction. In: Fitzpatrick, J.M., Reinhardt, J.M. (eds.) Image Processing, vol. 5747 (2005); Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) Medical Imaging (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olsén, C., Georgsson, F.: Problems related to automatic nipple extraction. In: Kalviainen, H., Parkkinen, J., Kaarna, A. (eds.) SCIA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3540, pp. 470–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsén, O.: Automatic Assessment of Mammogram Adequacy. Licentitate Thesis, Umeå University, Department of Computing Science (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smyth, P.: Bounds on the mean classification error rate of multiple experts. Pattern Recognition Letters 17, 1253–1257 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Warfield, S.K., Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M.: Validation of image segmentation and expert quality with an expectation-maximization algorithm. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2488, pp. 298–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M., Kikinis, R., Warfield, S.K.: Three validation metrics for automated probablistic image segmentation of brain tumours. Statistics in Medicine 23, 1259–1282 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olsén, C., Georgsson, F. (2006). Assessing Ground Truth of Glandular Tissue. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics