Abstract
Two-view mammography is known to be more effective than one-view in increasing breast cancer detection and reducing recall rates. In addition, there is evidence that computer aided detection (CAD) systems are able to prompt malignant abnormalities that have been overlooked by a human reader. Using data from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) we compared double reading with single reading using a CAD system, to assess the relationship between CAD and number of views in terms of the sensitivity of the screening regime to cancer detection and the recall rate of normal cases. CAD appeared to contribute to an increased cancer detection rate with single-view mammography without significantly increasing the recall rate. For two-view mammography, there was no significant change in sensitivity using CAD but a significantly higher recall rate. However, single-view mammography was used in incident rounds in which previous mammograms were available whereas two-view mammography was used in the prevalent round where no previous mammograms were available.
Keywords
- Recall Rate
- Cancer Detection Rate
- Double Reading
- High Recall Rate
- Prior Mammogram
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wald, N.J., Murphy, P., Major, P., Parkes, C., Townsend, J., Frost, C.: UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening. BMJ 311, 1189–1193 (2005)
Blanks, R.G., Bennett, R.L., Patnick, J., Cush, S., Davison, C., Moss, S.M.: The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates. Clinical Radiology 60, 674–680 (2005)
Burhenne, L.W., Wood, S., D’Orsi, C.J., Feig, S.A., Kopans, D.B., O’Shaughnessy, K.F., et al.: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215(2), 554–562 (2000)
Freer, T.W., Ulissey, M.J.: Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220(3), 781–786 (2001)
Gilbert, F.J., Astley, S.M., McGee, M.A., Gillan, M.G.C., Boggis, C.R.M., Griffiths, P.M., Duffy, S.W.: Comparison of double reading and single reading with CAD in the UK NHS Breast Screening Program: Computer Aided Detection Evaluation Trial (CADET). Radiology (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Agbaje, O.F. et al. (2006). Mammography Reading with Computer-Aided Detection (CAD): Single View vs Two Views. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)