Skip to main content

The Impact of Integration of Computer-Aided Detection and Human Observers

  • Conference paper
  • 1425 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNIP,volume 4046)

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of integration of CAD (Computer-Aided Detection) system and human observers in digital mammography. We compared the diagnostic efficacy of non-informed observers and informed observers regarding the CAD system’s ability (average FP (false positive) per four images and sensitivity of microcalcifications and mass) to detect cancer. With the informed-group, we previously informed them of the accuracy of CAD. In each group, observers recorded the diagnosis before utilizing the CAD system and after utilizing the CAD system according to BI-RADs category and to six additional categories associated with diagnostic confidence. Regarding diagnostic accuracy, with the informed group, sensitivity and NPV were improved without an increase in FP. On the other hand, the diagnostic accuracy of human observers was influenced by prior notification of CAD’s accuracy and by CAD’s performance in cancer detection itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor, P., Given-Wilson, R., Potts, H., et al.: Assessing the Impact of CAD Compared to Double Reading by Radiologists. In: IWDM 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Skaane, P., Kshirsagar, A., Staplenton, S.: False Positive CAD Marks on FFDM Acquired Normal Screening Mammograms. In: IWDM 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astley, S.M., Boggis, C.R.M., Walker, S., et al.: An Evaluation of a Commercial Prompting System in a Busy Screening Centre. In: IWDM 2002, pp. 471–475 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Astley, S.M., Boggis, C.R.M., Hillier, V.F.: Should We Use Humans or Machine to Pre-Screen Mammograms? In: IWDM 2002, pp. 476-480 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yip, M., Jong, R.A., Yaffe, M.J.: The Efficacy of a Digital Mammographic Computer-aided Detection System. In: IWDM 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Uchiyama, N., Moriyama, N., Yamada, T., Ohuchi, N. (2006). The Impact of Integration of Computer-Aided Detection and Human Observers. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35625-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35627-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics