Advertisement

Perceiving Relationships: A Physiological Examination of the Perception of Scatterplots

  • Lisa A. Best
  • Aren C. Hunter
  • Brandie M. Stewart
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4045)

Abstract

Researchers in all areas of science recognize the value of graphical displays and research on graphs has focused on determining which graphical elements enhance readability. To date, no research has examined the physiological processing of graphs. The purpose of this project was to examine the event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with the processing of bivariate scatterplots. Participants viewed scatterplots depicting different linear relationships (positive and negative; strong and weak) and their ERPs were analyzed. Results indicate interesting differences in how scatterplots are processed. Overall, there was differential processing in posterior, medial, and anterior brain sites. Sites on the left and right sides of the brain showed different patterns of activity in response to the scatterplots. In addition, results suggest that different relationships are processed differently in the brain (confirming previous research that has suggested that the perception of covariation is dependent upon the type of relationship depicted on a scatterplot).

Keywords

Stimulus Onset Graphical Display Brain Site Posterior Site Anterior Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, A.: Is a Graph Different than a Picture? An Electrophysiological Examination of Graph Perception. Unpublished honours thesis, University of New Brunswick (unpublished manuscript, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beniger, J.R., Robyn, D.: Quantitative Graphics in Statistics: A Brief History. The American Statistician 32, 1–11 (1978)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Best, L.A., Adams, A., Jones, S., Hickman, E., Hunter, A., LeBlanc, A., Stewart, B., Woodland, J.: Is A Picture Worth 1000 Words: An Electrophysiological Examination of Graph Perception. In: The CPA annual meeting (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beyth-Marom, R.: Perception of correlation reexamined. Memory and Cognition 10, 511–519 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleveland, W.S., McGill, R.: Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science 229, 828–833 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Erlick, D.E., Mills, R.: Perceptual quantification of conditional dependency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73, 9–14 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Funkhouser, H.G.: Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data. Osiris 3, 269–404 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holland, J.L.: Dual-coding Hypothesis and the Perception of Graphical Displays: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Unpublished honours thesis, University of New Brunswick, Saint John (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jausovec, N.: Differences in EEG alpha activity related to giftedness. Intelligence 23, 159–173 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jenkins, H.M., Ward, W.C.: Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. APA, Washington (1965)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kareev, Y.: Positive Bias in the Perception of Covariation. Psychological Review 102, 490–502 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolb, B., Whishaw, I.Q.: Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lane, D.M., Anderson, C.A., Kellam, K.L.: Judging the relatedness of variables: The psychophysics of covariation detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11, 640–649 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luck, S.J.: An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer, R.E., Anderson, R.B.: Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 484–490 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayer, R.E., Gallini, J.K.: When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 715–726 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 12, 107–119 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer, R.E.: Models for Understanding. Review of Educational Research 59, 43–64 (1989)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Mazard, A., Denis, M., Mellet, E.: Neural bases of image and language interactions. International Journal of Psychology 37, 204–208 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology 96, 165–173 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paivio, A.: Imagery and verbal processes. Holt Rinehart, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paivio, A.: Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petre, G., Green, T.R.G.: Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that ‘seeing’ an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 4, 55–70 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pinker, S.: A theory of graph comprehension. In: Friedle, R. (ed.) Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1990)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, L.D., Best, L.A., Cylke, V.A., Stubbs, D.A.: Psychology without p values: Data analysis at the turn of the century. American Psychologist 55, 260–263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strahan, R.F., Hansen, C.J.: Underestimating correlation from scatterplots. Applied Psychological Measurement 2, 543–550 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tilling, L.: Early experimental graphs. The British Journal for the History of Science 8, 193–213 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vekiri, I.: What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review 14, 261–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wainer, H.: Visual revelations. In: Graphical tales of fate and deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot, Copernicus, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilkinson, L.: Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54, 594–604 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa A. Best
    • 1
  • Aren C. Hunter
    • 1
  • Brandie M. Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of New BrunswickSaint JohnCanada

Personalised recommendations