A Repository of Services for the Government to Businesses Relationship

  • Daniele Barone
  • Gianluigi Viscusi
  • Carlo Batini
  • Paolo Naggar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4032)


We describe an experience of design of a repository of services, performed in an Italian project called Government for Businesses (G4B). The repository G4B represents several properties and characteristics of a wide number of services provided by public administrations to businesses in Italy. An ontology has been built on top of the repository, enriching it with several unifying classifications and metadata. The different usefulness of the repository for service providers, public administrations, businesses are discussed, and several examples are presented.


Business Process Public Administration Conceptual Schema Business Relationship Service Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Italian Government: The Italian Initiative on E-Government for Development. The Reference Model: E-Model (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition (5) (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontologies and information systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Proceedings of FOIS 1998. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uschold, M.: Knowledge level modelling: concepts and terminology. Knowledge Engineering Review (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2), 93–155 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uschold, M., Grüninger, M.: Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity. SIGMOD Record 33(4), 58–64 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elmasri, R., Navathe, S.: Foundamentals of database systems, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mika, P., Oberle, D., Gangemi, A., Sabou, M.: Foundations for service ontologies: aligning owls to dolce. In: WWW, pp. 563–572 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertoletti, M., Missier, P., Scannapieco, M., Aimetti, P., Batini, C.: Improving Government-to-Business Relationships through Data Reconciliation and Process Re-engineering. In: Wang, R. (ed.) Information Quality - Advances in Management Information Systems-Information Quality Monograph (AMIS-IQ) Monograph, Sharpe, M.E (2005); Shorter version also in ICIQ 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernstein, P.A., Dayal, U.: An overview of repository technology. In: VLDB 1994: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 705–713. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atzeni, P., Cappellari, P., Bernstein, P.: A Multilevel Dictionary for Model Management. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 160–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Themistocleus, M., Chen, H.: Investigating the integration of smes’ information systems: an exploratory case study. International Journal of Information Technology and Management 3(2/3/4), 208–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    UDDI.org: UDDI Technical White Paper (2001), Available on line (link checked October 1, 2001), http://www.uddi.org/pubs/lru_UDDI_Technical_Paper.pdf
  15. 15.
    Hull, R., Su, J.: Tools for composite Web Services: a short overview. SIGMOD Record 34(2) (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGuinness, D.L.: Ontological issues for knowledge-enhanced search. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, Washington (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taxonomic Databases Working Group Annual Meeting: Taxonomic Databases Working Group on Biodiversity Informatics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, Taxonomic Databases Working Group Annual Meeting (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ruggia, R., Ambrosio, A.P.: A toolkit for reuse in conceptual modelling. In: CAiSE, pp. 173–186 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palopoli, L., Terracina, G., Ursino, D.: Dike: a system supporting the semi automic construction of cooperative information systems from heterogeneous databases. Software Practice and Experience 33(9), 847–884 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Motro, A., Anokhin, P.: Fusionplex: resolution of data inconsistencies in the integration of heterogeneous information systems. Information fusion (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shoval, P., Danoch, R., Balaban, M.: Hierarchical entity-relationship diagrams: the model, method of creation and experimental evaluation. Requir. Eng. 9(4), 217–228 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oberle, D., Staab, S., Studer, R., Volz, R.: Supporting application development in the Semantic Web. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 5(2), 328–358 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, J., Gasser, L.: Mutual online concept learning for multiple agents. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 362–369. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Sebie, M., Irani, Z.: Technical and organisationals challenges facing transactional e-government systems: an empirical study. Electronic Government, an International Journal 2(3), 247–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Batini, C., Mecella, M.: Enabling Italian e-Government Through a Cooperative Architecture. IEEE Computer 34(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nikolopoulos, K., Patrikakis, C.Z., Lin, B.: Forecasting systems for e-government. Electronic Government, an International Journal 1(4), 374–383 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wimmer, M.A.: A european perspective towards online one-stop government: The egov project. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hagel III, J., Brown, J.S.: Your next IT strategy. Harvard Business Review, 106–113 (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Andersen, K.V.: Reengineering public sector organizations using information technology. Reinventing Government in the Information Age (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Batini, C., Garasi, M.F., Grosso, R.: Reuse of a repository of conceptual schemas in a large scale project. In: Advanced Topics in Database Research. Idea Book, USA (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniele Barone
    • 1
  • Gianluigi Viscusi
    • 1
  • Carlo Batini
    • 1
  • Paolo Naggar
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Informatica Sistemistica e Comunicazione (Disco)Università degli Studi di Milano-BicoccaItaly
  2. 2.Gruppo CMRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations