Advertisement

On the Meaning of Japanese Yo

  • Eric McCready
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4012)

Abstract

This paper considers the semantics and pragmatics of the Japanese particle yo. I argue that the meaning of yo is underspecified between a modal meaning and a ‘strong assertion’. In addition, yo is associated with a presupposition for new information and a modal statement about hearer beliefs.

Keywords

Lexical Item Discourse Relation Epistemic Modal Revision Operator Epistemic Possibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asher, N., McCready, E.: Were, Would, Must and a Compositional Account of Counterfactuals. In: Meeting of the Society for Exact Philosophy (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos, J.: Predicate Logic Unplugged. In: Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 133–143 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frank, A.: Context Dependence in Modal Constructions. PhD Thesis, University of Stuttgart (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gardenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Dynamic Montague Grammar. In: Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kartunnen, L.: Discourse Referents. In: McCawley, J. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7, Academic Press, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1973)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lewis, D.: Causation. Journal of Philosophy 70(17), 556–567 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masuoka, T., Takubo, Y.: Kisoo Nihongo Bunpoo [Essential Japanese Grammar]. Tokyo: Kurosio Syuppan (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCready, E.: The Dynamics of Particles. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCready, E., Reese, B.: Counterfactual Morphology and the Licensing of Modal Subordination in Hindi. In: SALA XXII (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noda, H.: Syuuzoyosi no kinoo [The function of particles]. Modariti [Modality], Kurosio Syuppan (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pustejovsky, J.: The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reyle, U.: Dealing with Ambiguities by Underspecification. Journal of Semantics 10, 123–179 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts, C.: Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 683–721 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kose, Y.S.: Japanese Sentence-final Particles: A Pragmatic Principle Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champignon (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, L., McCready, E., Asher, N.: Information Dependency in Quantificational Subordination. In: von Heusinger, K., Turner, K. (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, Elsevier, Amsterdam (to appear)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric McCready
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Language and Information ScienceOsaka University 

Personalised recommendations