Model Generation in a Dynamic Environment

  • Anders Søgaard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4012)


Conventionally anaphora is seen as triggered by grammar, i.e. as a saturation requirement. In this paper, it is demonstrated how this assumption complicates anaphora resolution considerably and instead it is proposed to let the fly out of the bottle and reconsider grammar’s contribution to anaphora resolution.


Minimal Model Noun Phrase Measure Phrase Discourse Referent Anaphora Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baumgartner, P., Kühn, M.: Abductive coreference by model construction. In: The 1st Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borthen, K., Haugereid, P.: Representing referential properties of nominals. Research on Language and Computation (to appear)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos, J.: Implementing the binding and accommodation theory for anaphora resolution and presupposition projection. Comp. Ling. 29, 179–210 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Copestake, A., et al.: Minimal recursion semantics (ms) (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fodor, J., Sag, I.: Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gundel, J., et al.: Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274–307 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J., et al. (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language, Math. Centrum, pp. 277–322 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kamp, H., et al.: Discourse representation theory. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic, D. Reidel (to appear)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohlhase, M.: Model generation for discourse representation theory. In: Horn, W. (ed.) The 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 441–445 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Konrad, K.: Model generation for natural language interpretation and analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pollard, C., Sag, I.: Head-driven phrase structure grammar. CSLI (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333–378 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Søgaard, A.: Update semantics for HPSG. In: Holmboe, H. (ed.) Nordisk Sprogteknologi 2005, Tusculanum, pp. 167–172 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Søgaard, A., Haugereid, P.: A computational HPSG grammar specifying the common subset of linguistic types for Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. In: Holmboe, H. (ed.) Nordisk Sprogteknologi 2004, Tusculanum, pp. 247–256 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Søgaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Language TechnologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen

Personalised recommendations