Skip to main content

Semantic Web Languages – Towards an Institutional Perspective

  • Chapter

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 4060)

Abstract

The Semantic Web (SW) is viewed as the next generation of the Web that enables intelligent software agents to process and aggregate data autonomously. Ontology languages provide basic vocabularies to semantically markup data on the SW. We have witnessed an increase of numbers of SW languages in the last years. These languages, such as RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), the OWL suite of languages, the OWL− − suite, SWRL, are based on different semantics, such as the RDFS-based, description logic-based, Datalog-based semantics. The relationship among the various semantics poses a challenge for the SW community for making the languages interoperable. Institutions provide a means of reasoning about software specifications regardless of the logical system. This makes it an ideal candidate to represent and reason about the various languages in the Semantic Web. In this paper, we construct institutions for the SW languages and use institution morphisms to relate them. We show that RDF framework together with the RDF serializations of SW languages form an indexed institution. This allows the use of Grothendieck institutions to combine Web ontologies described in various languages.

Keywords

  • Resource Description Framework
  • Description Logic
  • Model Constraint
  • Institutional Perspective
  • Ontology Language

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This work is partially supported by Singapore MOE project Rigorous Design Methods and Tools for Intelligent Autonomous (R-252-000-201-112) and NUS EERSS Program. The second author would like to thank Singapore Millennium Foundation (SMF) for the financial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/11780274_6
  • Chapter length: 25 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-540-35464-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angele, J., Boley, H., de Brujin, J., Fensel, D., Hitzler, P., Kifer, M., Krummenacher, R., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Studer, R.: Web Rule Language (WRL). Version 1.0 (2005), http://www.wsmo.org/wsml/wrl/wrl.html

  2. Barr, M., Wells, C.: Category Theory for Computing Science, 3rd edn. Les Publications CRM, Montreal (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V. (eds.): Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0 (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

  5. de Brujin, J., Lausen, H., Fensel, D.: OWL. Deliverable D20.1v0.2, WSML (2004), http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d20/d20.1/v0.2/

  6. Diaconescu, R.: Institution-independent Model Theory. http://www.imar.ro/diacon/ (to appear)

  7. Diaconescu, R.: Grothendieck institutions. Applied Categorical Structures 10, 383–402 (2002)

    MATH  CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, J.S., Lee, C.H., Li, Y.F., Wang, H.: Verifying DAML+OIL and beyond in Z/EVES. In: Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2004, pp. 201–210 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goguen, J.: Information Integration in Institutions. To appear in avolume dedicated to Jon Barwise, edited by Larry Moss (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goguen, J., Burstall, R.: Institutions: Abstract Model Theory for Specification and Programming. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 39(1), 95–146 (1992)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Goguen, J., Roşu, G.: Institution Morphisms. Formal Aspects of Computing 13, 274–307 (2002)

    MATH  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic. In: Proc. of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 48–57. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayes, P.: RDF Semantics (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

  14. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004), ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML (November 2004) http://www.daml.org/2004/11/fol/rules-all.html

  16. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. J. of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klyne, G., Carroll, J. (eds.): Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

  18. Lucanu, D., Li, Y.F., Dong, J.S.: Web Ontology Verification and Analysis in the Z Framework. Technical Report TR 05-01, University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” of Iaşi, Romania (January 2005), http://thor.info.uaic.ro/tr/tr05-01.ps

  19. McBride, B.: Jena: Implementing the RDF Model and Syntax Specification. In: 2nd Int’l Semantic Web Workshop (2001), http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/bwm/papers/20001221-paper/

  20. Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Semantics and Abstract Syntax (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-semantics-20040210/

  21. Patel-Schneider, P.: A proposal for a SWRL extension to forst-order logic (November 2004), http://www.daml.org/2004/11/fol/proposal

  22. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Fensel, D.: Layering the semantic web: Problems and directions. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Pierce, B.C.: Basic Category Theory for Computer Science. MIT, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucanu, D., Li, Y.F., Dong, J.S. (2006). Semantic Web Languages – Towards an Institutional Perspective. In: Futatsugi, K., Jouannaud, JP., Meseguer, J. (eds) Algebra, Meaning, and Computation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4060. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11780274_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11780274_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35462-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35464-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)