Evaluating Local Contributions to Global Performance in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
Wireless sensor networks are often studied with the goal of removing information from the network as efficiently as possible. However, when the application also includes an actuator network, it is advantageous to determine actions in-network. In such settings, optimizing the sensor node behavior with respect to sensor information fidelity does not necessarily translate into optimum behavior in terms of action fidelity. Inspired by neural systems, we present a model of a sensor and actuator network based on the vector space tools of frame theory that applies to applications analogous to reflex behaviors in biological systems. Our analysis yields bounds on both absolute and average actuation error that point directly to strategies for limiting sensor communication based not only on local measurements but also on a measure of how important each sensor-actuator link is to the fidelity of the total actuation output.
KeywordsSensor Network Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Communication Link Sensor Measurement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Rabbat, M., Nowak, R.D.: Distributed optimization in sensor networks. In: Intl. Symposium on Information Proc. in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Berkeley, CA (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Blatt, D., Hero, A.O.: Distributed maximum likelihood estimation in sensor networks. In: Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., Montreal, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
- 4.Liu, J., Chu, M., Liu, J., Reich, J.E., Zhao, F.: State-centric programming for sensor and actuator network systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing Magazine 2(4) (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Gerkey, B., Mataric, M.: A market-based formulation of sensor-actuator network coordination. In: AAAI Spring Symp. on Intel. Embed. and Dist. Sys., AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Coates, M.: Evaluating causal relationships in wireless sensor/actuator networks. In: Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc., Philadelphia, PA (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Lemmon, M.D., Ling, Q., Sun, Y.: Overload management in sensor-actuator networks used for spatially-distributed control systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM Sensys Conference (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., Jessell, T.: Principles of Neural Science. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT (1991)Google Scholar
- 9.Neil, D.M.: Compensatory eye movements. In: Sandeman, D., Atwood, H. (eds.) The Biology of Crustacea, Neural Integration and Behavior, pp. 133–163. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
- 10.Glantz, R., Nudelman, H., Waldrop, B.: Linear integration of convergent visual inputs in an oculomotor reflex pathway. J. of Neurophys. 52(6), 1213–1225 (1984)Google Scholar
- 12.Christensen, O.: An Introduction to Frames and Riesz Bases. Birkhauser, Boston, MA (2002)Google Scholar
- 14.Daubechies, I.: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA (1992)Google Scholar
- 20.Balan, R., Casazza, P., Heil, C., Landau, Z.: Density, overcompleteness, and localization of frames, I. Theory (preprint, 2005)Google Scholar