Advertisement

Towards Sustained Team Effectiveness

  • Niek Wijngaards
  • Masja Kempen
  • Annika Smit
  • Kees Nieuwenhuis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3913)

Abstract

Collaboration environments impose high demands on humans and artificial systems. Especially during critical tasks team members, including humans, artificial systems and other (sub-) teams, require support to guarantee their continued effectiveness. Effectiveness of individuals and teams is an important ingredient for organizational effectiveness, managerial decision quality, as well as for maintaining organizational awareness. In this position paper we introduce our conceptual view on realizing sustained team effectiveness, in which both the measurement of effectiveness and team management play an important role. A unified, interdisciplinary approach facilitates measuring effectiveness in more complex organizations.

Keywords

Team Member Team Management Artificial System Task Allocation Mental Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, K.A., Branch, K.M.: Concepts Underlying Organizational Effectiveness: Trends in the Organization and Management Science Literature. In: Management Benchmark Study, ch. 1, Office of Planning & Analysis, Department of Energy, USA (2002), http://www.sc.doe.gov/sc-5/whatwedo/com-benchmark.html
  2. 2.
    Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., Tannenbaum, S.I.: Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In: Swezey, R.W., Salas, E. (eds.) Teams: Their training and performance, pp. 3–29. Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sycara, K., Lewis, M.: Integrating intelligent agents into human teams. In: Salas, E. (ed.) Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lenox, T., Lewis, M., Roth, E., Roberts, L., Shern, R., Rafalski, T.: Support of Teamwork in Human-Agent Teams. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, October 12-14, 1998, pp. 1341–1346 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Payne, T.: Agent Roles in Human Teams. In: Proceedings of AAMAS-2003 Workshop on Humans and Multi-Agent Systems (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wijngaards, N., Nieuwenhuis, K., Burghardt, P.: Actor-Agent Communities in Dynamic Environments. In: Proceedings of the workshop ICT Agents, November 2004. TNO Defence, Security and Safety, The Hague, The Netherlands (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, Z., Carley, K.: Organizational Design and Adaptation in Response to Crises: Theory and Practice. In: 2001 Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, Washington, pp. B1–B7 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smit, A.S.: Vigilance or availability of processing resources: A study on cognitive energetics. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smit, A.S., Eling, P.A.T.M., Coenen, A.M.L.: Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica 115, 35–42 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parasuraman, R.: Sustained attention: a multifactorial approach. In: Posner, M.J., Marin, O.S.M. (eds.) Attention and performance, pp. 492–511. Erlbaum, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smit, A.S., Eling, P.A.T.M., Hopman, M.T., Coenen, A.M.L.: Mental and physical effort affect vigilance differently. Int. Jnl. of Psychophysiology 57, 211–217 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parasuraman, R., Davies, D.R. (eds.): Varieties of attention. Academic Press, Inc., Florida (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salden, A.H., Kempen, M.H.: Sustainable Cybernetics Systems - Backbones of Ambient Intelligent Environments. In: Remagnino, P., Foresti, G.L., Ellis, T. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence- A Novel Paradigm, November 2004, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooke, N.J., Stout, R., Salas, E.: A Knowledge Elicitation Approach To The Measurement Of Team Situation Awareness. In: McNeese, M., Endsley, M., Salas, E. (eds.) New Trends in Cooperative Activities: System Dynamics in Complex Settings, pp. 114–139. Human Factors, Santa Monica, CA (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nishiguchi, T., Beaudet, A.: Self-Organization and Clustered Control in the Toyota Group: Lessons from the Aisin Fire. Report #w-0167a, Massachusetts Institute of Technology International Motor vehicle Program (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van den Broek, E.L., Jonker, C.M., Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J., Yolum, p.: Formal modeling and analysis of organizations. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3913, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCallum, M., Vasconcelos, W.W., Norman, T.J.: Verification and analysis of organisational change. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3913, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Someren, M., Netten, N., Evers, V., Cramer, H., de Hoog, R., Bruinsma, G.: A trainable information distribution system to support crisis management. In: Carle, B., Van de Walle, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International ISCRAM Conference, Brussels, Belgium (April 2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oomes, A.H.J., Neef, R.M.: Scaling-up support for emergency response organizations. In: Carle, B., Van de Walle, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International ISCRAM Conference, Brussels, Belgium (April 2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wijngaards, N.J.E., Boonstra, H.M., Brazier, F.M.T.: The Role of Trust in Distributed Design. In: Brazier, F.M.T., Gero, J.S. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Special Issue on Intelligent Agents in Design, vol. 18, pp. 199–209 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilpert, B., Qvale, T.: Reliability and Safety in Hazardous Work Systems: Approaches to Analysis and Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, East Sussex, UK (1993)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schurr, N., Okamoto, S., Maheswaran, R.T., Scerri, P., Tambe, M.: Evolution of a Teamwork Model. In: Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: S-MOISE+: A Middleware for developing Organised Multi-Agent Systems. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3913, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dignum, F.P.M., Dignum, V., Sonenberg, L.: Exploring congruence between organizational structure and task performance: A simulation approach. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3913, pp. 213–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wolpert, D., Tumer, K.: An Introduction to Collective Intelligence. In: Handbook of Agent Technology, AAAI Press/MIT Press (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rasker, P.: Communication and Performance in Teams, PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klein, G., Woods, D.D., Bradshaw, J.M., Hoffman, R.R., Feltovich, P.J.: Ten Challenges for Making Automation a “team Player” in Joint Human-Agent Activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(6) (November/December 2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nourbakhsh, I., Sycara, K., Koes, M., Yong, M., Lewis, M., Burion, S.: Human-Robot Teaming for Search and Rescue. In: IEEE Pervasive Computing: Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, January 2005, pp. 72–78 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niek Wijngaards
    • 1
  • Masja Kempen
    • 1
  • Annika Smit
    • 1
  • Kees Nieuwenhuis
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft Co-operation in Intelligent Systems Laboratory – Thales Research and Technology NederlandDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations