A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Scientific Inquiry Exploratory Learning Environment

  • Choo-Yee Ting
  • M. Reza Beik Zadeh
  • Yen-Kuan Chong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)


Although existing computer-based scientific inquiry learning environments have proven to benefit learners, effectively inferring and intervening within these learning environments remain an open issue. To tackle this challenge, this article will firstly address the issue on learning model by proposing Scientific Inquiry Exploratory Learning Model. Secondly, aiming at effective modeling and intervening under uncertainty in modeling learner’s exploratory behaviours, decision-theoretic approach is integrated into INQPRO. This approach allows INQPRO to compute a probabilistic assessment on learner’s scientific inquiry skills (Hypothesis Generation and Variables Identification), domain knowledge, and subsequently provides tailored hints. This article ends with an investigation on the accuracy of proposed learner model by performing a model walk-through with human expert and field trial evaluation with a total number of 30 human students.


Variable Identification Intelligent Tutor System Query Node Inquiry Learning Environment Decision Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Frederiksen, J.R., White, B.Y.: Teaching and learning generic modeling and reasoning skills. Journal of Interactive learning Environment 5, 33–52 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linn, M.C.: Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education 22, 781–796 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pryor, A., Soloway, E.: Foundation of Science: Using Technology to Support Authentic Science learning (1997), http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/
  4. 4.
    Reiser, B.J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W.A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., Leone, T.J.: BGuILE: Stategic and Conceptual Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry in Biology Classrooms. In: Carver, S.M., Klahr, D. (eds.) Cognition and Instruction: Twenty five years of progress. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shimoda, T.A., White, B.Y., Frederiksen, J.R.: Student goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education 86, 244–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paolucci, M., Suthers, D., Weiner, A.: Automated advice giving strategies for scientific inquiry. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., Lesgold, A. (eds.) 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Stystems (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veermans, K., van Joolingen, W.R.: Combining Heuristics and Formal Methods in a Tool for Supporting Simulation-Based Discovery Learning. In: 7th Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Brazil (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shute, V.J., Glaser, R.: A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interative Learning Environments 1, 51–77 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, T., Kretschmer, M., Meyer, T., Steuck, K., Pesthy, C.: Teaching Scientific Inquiry Skills with an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jameson, A.: Numerical Uncertainty Management in User and Student Modeling: An Overview of Systems and Issues. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 5, 193–251 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murray, R.C., VanLehn, K., Mostow, J.: Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: A decision-theoretic approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14, 235–278 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pek, P.K., Poh, K.L.: Making decisions in an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 4, 207–233 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayo, M., Mitrovic, A.: Optimizing ITS behaviour with Bayesian networks and decision theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education 12, 124–153 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., Kaplan, D.: The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction 18, 295–523 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Löhner, S., Van Joolingen, W.R., Savelsberg, E.R., Van Hout- Wolters, B.: Students’ reasoning during modeling in an inquiry learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior 21, 441–461 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ting, C.Y.: Integrating Animated Pedagogical Agent into Scientific Inquiry Model: A Cognitive Tools Perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Computers in Education 2002, Auckland, New Zealand, December 3-6 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Jong, T., van Joolingen, Wouter, R.: Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68, 179–201 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    VanLehn, K.: Student Modeling. In: Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 55–78. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karasavvidis, I., Pieters, J.M., Plomp, T.: Exploring the mechanisms through which computers contribute to learning. J. Comp. Assisted Learning 19, 115–128 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chi, M.T.H., Roscoe, R.D.: The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Limon, M., Mason, L. (eds.) Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Kluwer, Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ting, C.Y., Zadeh, M.R.B., Liau, B.H.: Artificial Student Toolkit for Assessing Bayesian Student Model. In: Proceedings of IEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Choo-Yee Ting
    • 1
  • M. Reza Beik Zadeh
    • 2
  • Yen-Kuan Chong
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Technology 
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering 
  3. 3.Center for Multimedia Education and Application DevelopmentMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations