Advertisement

P.A.C.T. – Scaffolding Best Practice in Home Tutoring

  • Orla Lahart
  • Declan Kelly
  • Brendan Tangney
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)

Abstract

Research indicates a high correlation between parental involvement and a child’s learning. The most effective parental involvement is when parents engage in learning activities with their child at home. However, parental involvement around learning activities may not occur spontaneously due to lack of domain knowledge, teaching strategies or structured support. This paper discusses how these issues can be addressed through the Parent and Child Tutor (P.A.C.T.). In particular, P.A.C.T will provide support for Suzuki parents during violin practice at home. This paper presents two studies; the first study identifies a set of best practice exemplars through lesson observations and interviews with the domain expert which informs the design of P.A.C.T. The second study validates the design of the system through analysing parent-child practice with and without the support of P.A.C.T. Results suggests that P.A.C.T. is effective in significantly increasing the use of best practice exemplars, in particular positive reinforcement and motivational games.

Keywords

Domain Expert Positive Reinforcement Home Practice Lesson Observation Music Lesson 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenwood, G.E., Hickman, C.W.: Research and practice in parent involvement: Implications for teacher education. The Elementary School Journal 91, 278–288 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dornbusch, S.M., Ritter, P.L.: Parents of high school students: A neglected resource. Educational Horizons 66, 75–77 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suzuki, S.: Nurtured by Love: The Classic Approach to Talent Education, 2nd edn. Suzuki Method International (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hickman, C.W., Greenwood, G.E., Miller, M.D.: High school parent involvement: Relationships with achievement, grade level, SES, and gender. Journal of Research and Development in Education 28, 125–134 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978) (Original material published in 1930, 1933 and 1935)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Starr, C., Starr, W.: To learn with love: a companion for Suzuki parents. K. Ellis Press, Knoxville (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McLoughlin, C., Winnips, K., Oliver, R.: Supporting Constructivist Learning through Learner Support On-line. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2000, pp. 674–680. AACE, Norfolk (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wells, G.: Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., et al.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–53 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luckin, R., Hammerton, L.: Getting to know me: Helping learners understand their own learning needs through metacognitive scaffolding. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 759–771. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., et al.: The Design of Guided Learner-Adaptable Scaffolding in Interactice Learning Environments. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, California, United States. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National ParentNet Association [Accessed December 20, 2005], Available from: http://www.parentnetassociation.org/content/resources/research.htm
  13. 13.
    IBM Research ThinkReseach: New educational software devised by IBM - Featured Concept Wired for Learning By Stephen S.Hall [Accessed December 20, 2005], Available from: http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/wwwr_thinkresearch.nsf/pages/wired396.html
  14. 14.
    NumberWorks@Home [Accessed December 20, 2005], Available from: http://www.numberworks.com/nwathome/default.asp
  15. 15.
    O’Connor, J., KeraWalla, L., Lickin, R.: Using Discuission Prompts to Scaffold Parent-Child Collaboration Around a Computer-Based Activity. In: Proceedings of AIED 2005, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 176–183 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Parent Tutor [Accessed December 20, 2005], Available from: https://parenttutor.com/default.asp

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orla Lahart
    • 1
  • Declan Kelly
    • 1
  • Brendan Tangney
    • 2
  1. 1.National College of IrelandIreland
  2. 2.Trinity CollegeUniversity of DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations