Advertisement

Motivating the Learner: An Empirical Evaluation

  • Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez
  • Benedict du Boulay
  • Rosemary Luckin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)

Abstract

The M-Ecolab was developed to provide motivational scaffolding via an on-screen character whose demeanour defended on modelling the learner’s motivational state at interaction time. Motivational modelling was based on three variables: effort, independence and the confidence. A classroom evalu-ation was conducted to illustrate the effects of motivational scaffolding. Students had an eighty minute interaction with the M-Ecolab, divided into two sessions. The results suggested a positive effect of the motivational scaffolding, particularly for initially de-motivated students who demonstrated higher learning gains. We found that these students followed the suggestions of the on-screen character which delivered personalized feedback. They behaved in a way that was conducive to learning by being challenge-seekers and displaying an inclination to exert more effort. This paper gives a detailed account of the methodology and findings that resulted from the empirical evaluation.

Keywords

Empirical Evaluation Motivational Modelling Intelligent Tutor System Learning Gain Ability Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiner, B.: History of Motivational Research in Education. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(4), 616–622 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lepper, M.R., Chabay, R.W.: Socializing the Intelligent Tutor. In: Lepper, M.R., Chabay, R.W. (eds.) Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malone, T., Lepper, M.: Making learning fun. In: Malone, T., Lepper, M. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: Conative and Affective Process Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song, S.H., Keller, J.M.: Effectiveness of Motivationlly Adaptive Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Dynamic Aspect of Motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development 49(2), 5–22 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Del Soldato, T., du Boulay, B.: Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6, 337–378 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Vicente, A., Pain, H.: Informing the Detection of the Students’ Motivational State: An Empirical Study. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, p. 933. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luckin, R., du Boulay, B.: Ecolab: The Development and Evaluation of a Vygostskian Design Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence 10, 198–220 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luckin, R.: Ecolab: Explorations in the Zone of Proximal Development, PhD Thesis, in School of Cognitive & Computer Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luckin, R., Hammerton, L.: Getting to Know Me: Helping Learners Understand Their Own Learning Needs through Metacognitive Scaffolding. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wood, D.J., Wood, H.A.: An experimental evaluation of four face to face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioural Development 1, 131–147 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rebolledo, G.: Motivational Modelling in a Vygotskyan ITS. In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) Proc. Intelligence in Education: 11th International Conference, AIED 2003, pp. 537–538. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rebolledo Mendez, G., Boulay, B.d., Luckin, R.: Be bold and take a challenge: Could motivational strategies improve help-seeking? In: Looi, C., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (eds.) Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education: 12th International Conference, AIED 2005, pp. 459–466. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harter, S.: A new self report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology 17(3), 300–312 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wright, D.B.: Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t-tests and ancova produce different results, Brighton, p. 23 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keller, J.M.: Motivational Design of Instruction. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional-Design theories and models: An overview of their current status, pp. 383–434. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez
    • 1
  • Benedict du Boulay
    • 1
  • Rosemary Luckin
    • 2
  1. 1.IDEAS Lab, Department of InformaticsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.London Knowledge Lab, Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations