Motivating the Learner: An Empirical Evaluation
The M-Ecolab was developed to provide motivational scaffolding via an on-screen character whose demeanour defended on modelling the learner’s motivational state at interaction time. Motivational modelling was based on three variables: effort, independence and the confidence. A classroom evalu-ation was conducted to illustrate the effects of motivational scaffolding. Students had an eighty minute interaction with the M-Ecolab, divided into two sessions. The results suggested a positive effect of the motivational scaffolding, particularly for initially de-motivated students who demonstrated higher learning gains. We found that these students followed the suggestions of the on-screen character which delivered personalized feedback. They behaved in a way that was conducive to learning by being challenge-seekers and displaying an inclination to exert more effort. This paper gives a detailed account of the methodology and findings that resulted from the empirical evaluation.
KeywordsEmpirical Evaluation Motivational Modelling Intelligent Tutor System Learning Gain Ability Student
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Lepper, M.R., Chabay, R.W.: Socializing the Intelligent Tutor. In: Lepper, M.R., Chabay, R.W. (eds.) Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, New York (1988)Google Scholar
- 3.Malone, T., Lepper, M.: Making learning fun. In: Malone, T., Lepper, M. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: Conative and Affective Process Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1987)Google Scholar
- 5.Del Soldato, T., du Boulay, B.: Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6, 337–378 (1995)Google Scholar
- 7.Luckin, R., du Boulay, B.: Ecolab: The Development and Evaluation of a Vygostskian Design Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence 10, 198–220 (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Luckin, R.: Ecolab: Explorations in the Zone of Proximal Development, PhD Thesis, in School of Cognitive & Computer Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH (1998)Google Scholar
- 10.Wood, D.J., Wood, H.A.: An experimental evaluation of four face to face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioural Development 1, 131–147 (1978)Google Scholar
- 11.Rebolledo, G.: Motivational Modelling in a Vygotskyan ITS. In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) Proc. Intelligence in Education: 11th International Conference, AIED 2003, pp. 537–538. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Rebolledo Mendez, G., Boulay, B.d., Luckin, R.: Be bold and take a challenge: Could motivational strategies improve help-seeking? In: Looi, C., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (eds.) Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education: 12th International Conference, AIED 2005, pp. 459–466. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Wright, D.B.: Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t-tests and ancova produce different results, Brighton, p. 23 (2004)Google Scholar
- 15.Keller, J.M.: Motivational Design of Instruction. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional-Design theories and models: An overview of their current status, pp. 383–434. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1983)Google Scholar