From Learner Information Packages to Student Models: Which Continuum?

  • Lahcen Oubahssi
  • Monique Grandbastien
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)


User adaptation has been a major issue of ITS research since the beginning. At first knowledge about individual learners was used to produce adaptive educational hypermedia. Then, the deployment of web based learning management systems put the need to exchange learner data between systems in the forefront. Nowadays, specifications for describing learner information in a standardized way are being developed. So far most existing systems have processed learner data. Yet the processed data are neither the same nor are they used for the same purposes, even if they are data about the learners. We argue that it is time to bridge the gap between the many sets of data about a learner processed within different learning environments. We propose a set of categories for describing learner information that goes beyond IMS LIP and could bring a link with ITS learner models.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chen, W., Mizoguchi, R.: Communication Content Ontology for Learner Model Agent in Multi-agent Architecture. In: Proceedings of AIED 1999 Workshop on Ontologies for Intelligent Educational Systems (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mc Calla, G.: The Ecological Approach to the design of E-learning Environments: Purpose-based Capture and Use of Information About Learners. JIME 7, 23 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray, T.: Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the state of the art. IJAIED (10), 34 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: The role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. BJET 34(4), 487–497 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kay, J., Lum, A.: Exploiting Readily Available Web Data for Reflective Student Models. In: Proceedings of AIED 2005, pp. 338–345. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esposito, F., Licchelli, O., Semeraro, G.: Discovering Student Models in e-learning Systems. Journal of Universal Computer Science 10(1), 47–57 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosemary, R.: Metadata standards for the description of portal users: a review Version 1.0, PORTAL WP6 (2003),
  8. 8.
    Paramythis, A., Loidl-Reisinger, S., Kepler, J.: Adaptive Learning Environments and e-Learning Standards. Electronic Journal on e-Learning 2(1), 181–194 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grandbastien, M., Oubahssi, L., Claës, G.: A process oriented approach for modelling on line Learning Environments. In: Supplemental proceedings AIED 2003, Sydney, vol. 4, pp. 140–152 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oubahssi, L., Grandbastien, M., Ngomo, M., Claës, G.: The Activity at the Center of the Global Open and Distance Learning Process. In: Proceedings of AIED 2005, pp. 386–394. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oubahssi, L.: Conception de plates-formes logicielles pour la formation à distance, présentant des propriétés d’adaptabilité à différentes catégories d’usagers et d’interopérabilité avec d’autres environnements logiciels. Thèse de Doctorat en informatique, Université René Descartes Paris V (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lahcen Oubahssi
    • 1
  • Monique Grandbastien
    • 2
  1. 1.Université René Descartes Laboratoire CRIP5 /AIDAPARIS
  2. 2.Université Henri Poincaré Nancy1 Lab. LORIA/AIDAVANDOEUVREFrance

Personalised recommendations