Advertisement

SPRITS: Secure Pedagogical Resources in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

  • Esma Aïmeur
  • Flavien Serge Mani Onana
  • Anita Saleman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)

Abstract

During the training phase in an Intelligent Tutoring System, learners usually require help. However, it may happen that the tutor cannot provide such help, unless it has access to additional pedagogical resources. Moreover, in a collaborative but competitive learning environment in which each user could be both learner and expert, security problems may arise. For instance, the exchanges between users could require security services such as anonymity, confidentiality and integrity. In this paper, we introduce a system, called SPRITS, whose aim is to provide the tutor with mechanisms to capture, exploit, organize, deliver and evaluate learners knowledge, in a secure way, based on the learner-expert concept. Our main contribution is the introduction of security services in an ITS for the benefit of learners. This may be helpful to protect learners’ privacy as well as communication contents and pedagogical resources in an artificial competitive peer environment, thus allowing the tutor to better evaluate learners.

Keywords

Recommender System Collaborative Learning Security Service Collaborative Filter Pedagogical Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aïmeur, E., Burke, R., Mouaddib, A.: Workshop on Multi-Agent Information Retrieval and Recommender Systems. In: IJCAI 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aïmeur, E., Frasson, C., Dufort, H.: Co-operative Learning Strategies for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Applied Artificial Intelligence. An International Journal 14(5), 465–490 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becks, A., Reichling, T., Wulf, V.: Supporting collaborative learning by matching actors. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Science (HICSS 2003), Big Island, Hawaii (January 2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, R.: Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 4(12), pp. 331–370. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budzik, J., Hammond, K.J.: Q&A: a system for the capture, organization and reuse of expertise. In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Conference of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS), Medford, October/November (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campbell, S.: How to think about security failures. Communication of ACM 49(1), 37–39 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan, T.W., Baskin, A.B.: Learning companion systems. In: Frasson, Gauthier (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education. Ablex Publishing, New Jersey (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diffie, W., Hellman, M.E.: New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 22(6), 644–654 (1976)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falchikov, N.: Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education, RoutledgeFalmer (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B.M., Terry, D.: Using collaborative filtering to weave and information tapestry. Communications of the ACM 35(12), 61–70 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greer, J.E., McCalla, G.I., Cooke, J., Collins, J., Kumar, V., Bishop, A., Vassileva, J.: The Intelligent Helpdesk: Supporting Peer-Help in a University Course. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds.) ITS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1452, pp. 494–503. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 241–250 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kochakornjarupong, D., Brna, P., Vickers, P.: Who helps the helpers? A situated scaffolding system for supporting less experienced feedback givers. In: Looi (ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 851–853. IOP Press, Bristol (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolodner, J.L., Leake, D.B.: A tutorial Introduction to Case-Based Reasoning. In: Leake, D. (ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons & Future Directions, ch. 2, pp. 81–92 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenz, M.: Defining Knowledge Layers for Textual Case-Based Reasoning. In: Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. (eds.) EWCBR 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1488, pp. 298–309. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Merkle, R.C.: Secure communications over insecure channels. Communications of the ACM 21, 294–299 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Sushak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 Computer Supported Collaborative Work Conference, pp. 175–186. Chapel Hill, North Carolina (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vassileva, J., McCalla, G., Greer, J.: Multi-Agent Multi-User Modelling in I-Help. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction 31(1), 179–210 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esma Aïmeur
    • 1
  • Flavien Serge Mani Onana
    • 1
  • Anita Saleman
    • 1
  1. 1.Département IROUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations