Time in the Adaptive Tutoring Process Model

  • Alke Martens
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)


Formal models can be found in different computer science domains – they have the advantage to be independent of application domains and of programming languages. ITSs development is usually not based on formal models. Based on automaton theory and on formal descriptions known from modelling and simulation, the formal tutoring process model (tpm) is a formal model for ITSs. The model exists as basic tpm and as adaptive tpm. The extension of the adaptive model is described in the paper. Extended with a temporal dimension, i.e. the ’counter’, the static tpm can be used to realize another way of adaptation: the training case can be changed at runtime based on the counter values. This value can count the learner’s steps in the training case, it can be interpreted as duration, or as validity of a state.


Learner Model Internal Clock Intelligent Tutor System Pattern Language Training Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Allen, J.F.: Time and Time Again: The Many Ways to Represent Time. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 6(4), 341–355 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison Wesley Longman, Massachusetts (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clancey, W.J.: Methodology for Building an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Kintsch, W., Miller, J.R., Polson, P.G. (eds.) Methods and Tactics in Cognitive Sciences, pp. 51–84. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 849–874. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DCMI. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2002),
  6. 6.
    Devedzic, V.: Using Design Patterns in ITS Development. In: Lajoie, S.P., Vivet, M. (eds.) Proc. of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AI–ED, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 657–659 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devedzic, V.: A Pattern Language for Architectures of Intelligent Tutors. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proc. of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AI–ED, San Antonio, TX, US, pp. 542–544 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Docs ‘n Drugs - The virtual hospital (2000),
  9. 9.
    Farance, F., Tonkel, J.: LTSA Specification - Learning Technology Systems Architecture, Draft 8 (2001),
  10. 10.
    Harrer, A., Martens, A.: Towards a Pattern Language for Intelligent Teaching and Training Systems. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (submitted, 2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Illmann, T., Weber, M., Martens, A., Seitz, A.: A Pattern-Oriented Design of a Web-Based and Case-Oriented Multimedia Training System in Medicine. In: 4th World Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology, Dallas, US (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lelouche, R.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems from Birth to Now. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, Germany 4, 5–11 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martens, A., Bernauer, J., Illmann, T., Seitz, A.: Docs ’n Drugs - The Virtual Polyclinic An Intelligent Tutoring System for Web-Based and Case-Oriented Training in Medicine. In: Proc. of the American Medical Informatics Conference AMIA (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martens, A.: Centralize the Tutoring Process in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Proc. of the 5th Internat. Conf. New Educational Environments ICNEE, Lucerne, Switzerland (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martens, A.: Case-based or Problem-based – An Investigation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Journal Methods of Information in Medicine (submitted, 2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martens, A.: Modeling of Adaptive Tutoring Processes. In: Zongmin, M. (ed.) Web-Based Intelligent e-Learning Systems: Technologies and Applications, Hershey, London, pp. 193–215. Information Science Publishing, Idea Group Inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martens, A.: Towards a Dynamic Tutoring Process Model. In: International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (submitted, 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martens, A., Himmelspach, J.: Combining Intelligent Tutoring and Simulation Systems. In: Proc. of the Internat. Conference on Simulation in Human Computer Interfaces, SIMCHI, Part of the Western Multi Conference WMC 2005, New Orleans, US (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martens, A., Uhrmacher, A.M.: Modeling Tutoring as a Dynamic Process - A Discrete Event Simulation Approach. In: Szczerbicka, H. (ed.) Proc. of the European Simulation Multiconference ESM, pp. 111–119 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martens, A., Uhrmacher, A.M.: A Formal Tutoring Process Model for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Proc. of the European Artificial Intelligence Conference ECAI (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merseth, K.: The Early History of Case-Based Instruction. Journal of Teacher Education 42(4), 243–249 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rickel, J.: Intelligent Computer Aided Instruction: A Survey Organized Around System Components. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(1), 40–57 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willms, J., Möbus, C.: Evolution of the Hypotheses Testing Approach in Intelligent Problem Solving Environments. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 403–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alke Martens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations