Advertisement

Conceptual Change Modeling Using Dynamic Bayesian Network

  • Choo-Yee Ting
  • Yen-Kuan Chong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4053)

Abstract

Modeling the process of conceptual change in scientific inquiry learning environments involves uncertainty inherent in inferring learner’s mental models. INQPRO, an intelligent scientific inquiry exploratory learning environment, refers to a probabilistic learner model aims at modeling conceptual change through the interactions with INQPRO Graphical User Interface (GUI) and Intelligent Pedagogical Agent. In this article, we first discuss how conceptual change framework can be integrated into scientific inquiry learning environment. Secondly, we discuss the identification and categorization of conceptual change and learner properties to be modeled. Thirdly, how to construct the INQPRO learner model that employs Dynamic Bayesian networks (DBN) to compute a temporal probabilistic assessment of learner’s properties that vary over time: awareness of current belief, cognitive conflict, conflict resolution, and ability to accommodate to new knowledge. Towards the end of this article, a sample assessment of the proposed DBN is illustrated through a revisit of the INQPRO Scenario interface.

Keywords

Bayesian Network Conceptual Change Time Slice Dynamic Bayesian Network Bayesian Network Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reiser, B.J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W.A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., Leone, T.J.: BGuILE: Stategic and Conceptual Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry in Biology Classrooms. In: Carver, S.M., Klahr, D. (eds.) Cognition and Instruction: Twenty five years of progress. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linn, M.C.: Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education 8(22), 781–796 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shimoda, T.A., White, B.Y., Frederiksen, J.R.: Learner goal orientation in learning inquiry skills with modifiable software advisors. Science Education 86, 244–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aleven, V., Roll, I., McLaren, B., Ryu, E.J., Koedinger, K.: An architecture to combine meta-cognitive and cognitive tutoring: Pilot testing the Help Tutor. In: AIED 2005, Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bunt, A., Conati, C., Muldner, K.: Scaffolding self-explanation to improve learning in exploratory learning environments. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 656–667. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wichmann, A., Gottdenker, J., Jonassen, D., Milrad, M.: Developing a Framework for Conceptual Change within Scientific Inquiry. In: ICALT 2003, Greece (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jameson, A.: Numerical Uncertainty Management in User and User Modeling: An Overview of Systems and Issues. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact 5 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murray, R.C., VanLehn, K., Mostow, J.: Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: A decision-theoretic approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chi, M.T.H., Roscoe, R.D.: The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Limon, M., Mason, L. (eds.) Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Kluwer, Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vosniadou, S.: On the nature of naive physics. In: Limon, M., Mason, L. (eds.) Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carey, S.: Conceptual Change in Childhood. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., Gertzog, W.A.: Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zirbel, L.E.: Framework for Conceptual Change (2005), http://cosmos.phy.tufts.edu/~zirbel/ScienceEd/Framework-for-Conceptual-Change.pdf
  15. 15.
    Schafer, R., Weyrath, T.: Assessing Temporally Variable User Properties With Dynamic Bayesian Networks. In: User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference. Springer, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ting, C.Y., Beik Zadeh, M.R.: Modelling and Supporting Learners in Scientific Inquiry Exploratory Learning: A Bayesian Approach. In: ED-MEDIA 2005, Montreal, Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    VanLehn, K.: Student Modeling. In: Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Choo-Yee Ting
    • 1
  • Yen-Kuan Chong
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Technology 
  2. 2.Center for Multimedia Education and Application DevelopmentMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations