A Unified Approach to Adaptive Hypermedia Personalisation and Adaptive Service Composition

  • Ian O’Keeffe
  • Owen Conlan
  • Vincent Wade
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4018)


Adaptive Hypermedia is utilised in several domains, such as eLearning and professional training, where there is a growing movement towards the use of cognitively richer and more ‘active’ approaches to user engagement. In order to support this move, it is vital that adaptive personalisation systems, in these domains, are capable of integrating adaptively composed activities into adaptively personalised content compositions [1]. Through the integration of the approaches that are used in the automated composition of web services with those found in Adaptive Hypermedia, we believe that it will be possible to support a unified approach to the adaptation of content and services through the leveraging of the characteristics that are common to both adaptive application domains.


Service Composition Hierarchical Task Network Adaptive Navigation Adaptive Presentation Adaptive Engine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hodgins, W.: Leadership in learning: Accelerating the arrival of the future. Closing presentation at the Innovations in eLearning Symposium (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Bra, P., Aerts, A., Berden, B., De Lange, B., Rousseau, B., Santic, T., Smits, D., Stash, N.: AHA! the adaptive hypermedia architecture. In: Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext Conference, pp. 81–84 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusilovsky, P.: KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive e-learning. In: Proceedings of The Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2004 (Alternate track papers and posters), pp. 104–113. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conlan, O., Hockemeyer, C., Wade, V., Albert, D.: Metadata driven approaches to facilitate adaptivity in personalized eLearning systems. Journal of the Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education 1(1), 38–45 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalziel, J.: Implementing learning design: The learning activity management system (LAMS). In: Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dagger, D., Wade, V., Conlan, O.: Personalisation for all: Making adaptive course composition easy. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 8(3), 9–25 (2005) (Special Issue on Authoring of Adaptive Hypermedia)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson, S., Blinco, K., Rehak, D.: An E-Learning framework. In: Proceedings of the Advaning Learning Technology Interoperability Lab Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, J., Su, X.: A survey of automated web service composition methods. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 87–129 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., Fullick, P.: Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. In: Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pp. 41–53 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., Magoulas, G.D.: Personalizing the interaction in a web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13(3), 213–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herder, E., van Dijk, B.: Personalized adaptation to device characteristics. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) AH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2347, pp. 598–602. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brady, A., Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Dynamic composition and personalization of PDA-based eLearning - personalized mLearning. In: Richards, G. (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, Washington, DC, USA, AACE, pp. 234–242 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higel, S., Lewis, D., Wade, V.: Realising personalised web service composition through adaptive replanning. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 49–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McIlraith, S., Son, T.: Adapting Golog for composition of semantic web services. In: Proceeding of the Eighth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McDermott, D.: Estimated-regression planning for interactions with web services. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI Planning and Scheduling. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, D., Sirin, E., Hendler, J., Nau, D.: Automatic web services composition using SHOP2. In: Workshop on Planning for Web Services (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian O’Keeffe
    • 1
  • Owen Conlan
    • 1
  • Vincent Wade
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge and Date Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity CollegeIreland

Personalised recommendations