Advertisement

Privacy in India: Attitudes and Awareness

  • Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
  • Lorrie Cranor
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3856)

Abstract

In recent years, numerous surveys have been conducted to assess attitudes about privacy in the United States, Australia, Canada, and the European Union. Very little information has been published about privacy attitudes in India. As India is becoming a leader in business process outsourcing, increasing amounts of personal information from other countries is flowing into India. Questions have been raised about the ability of Indian companies to adequately protect this information. We conducted an exploratory study to gain an initial understanding of attitudes about privacy among the Indian high tech workforce. We carried out a written survey and one-on-one interviews to assess the level of awareness about privacy-related issues and concern about privacy among a sample of educated people in India. Our results demonstrate an overall lack of awareness of privacy issues and less concern about privacy in India than has been found in similar studies conducted in the United States.

Keywords

Personal Information Privacy Policy Privacy Concern Internet Penetration Internet Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Achappa, S.: Outsourcing is a bubble in India. CIOL (October 2004), http://www.ciol.com/content/news/BPO/2004/104101402.asp
  2. 2.
    Adkinson, F.W., et al.: Privacy Online: A Report on the Information Practices and Policies of Commercial Web sites. The Progress and Freedom. Special Report (March 2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellman, S., Johnson, E.J., Kobrin, S.J., Lohse, G.L.: International Differences in Information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. The Information Society 20, 313–324 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beveridge, C.: Photographs of India: Kolkota during 2001 (visited January 16, 2005), http://www.colinbeveridge.com/travelarticle.asp?article=16
  5. 5.
    Bhupta, M.: Privacy on Sale. India Today International (September 27, 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Marco, B., Prigmore, M.: Cultural Aspects of Internet Privacy. In: Proceedings of the UKAIS 2002 Conference. Leeds (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Business Line. Tech job loss will be other industries’ gain (October 2004), http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/10/16/stories/2004101601900500.htm
  8. 8.
    Business Standard. NASSCOM to set up employee database (April 2005) (visited April 23, 2005), http://www.nasscom.org/artDisplay.asp?art_id=4247
  9. 9.
    Lorrie Faith, C.: Web Privacy with P3P. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cranor, L., Joseph, R., Ackerman, M.S.: Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users’ Attitudes About Online Privacy. In: Proceedings of the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, VA, September 25-27 (1999), http://www.research.att.com/resources/trs/TRs/99/99.4/99.4.3/report.htm
  11. 11.
    Culnan, M.J., Milne, G.R.: The Culnan-Milne Survey on Consumers & Online Privacy Notices (December 2001), http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/glb/supporting/culnan-milne.pdf
  12. 12.
    Culnan, M.J.: Georgetown Internet Privacy Policy Survey: Report to the Federal Trade Commission (June 1999), http://www.msb.edu/faculty/culnanm/GIPPS/mmrpt.PDF
  13. 13.
    Department of Information Technology. Information Technology Act 2000 (visited November 10, 2004), http://www.mit.gov.in/it-bill.asp
  14. 14.
    Duggal, P.: Licence to shoot. Yahoo! India News (December 24, 2004), http://in.news.yahoo.com/041224/48/2in9n.html
  15. 15.
    Economist. Oursourcing to India: Safety Matters (September 2, 2004), http://www.economist.com/finance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3160118
  16. 16.
    Fannin, R.: India’s Outsourcing Boom. Chief Executive, vol. 198 (March 2004), http://www.chiefexecutive.net/depts/outsourcing/198.htm
  17. 17.
    Fjetland, M.: Global Commerce and The privacy clash. The Information Management Journal (January/February 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Susannah F.: Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet & American Life Project (August 20, 2000) (visited September 22, 2004), http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Trust_Privacy_Report.pdf
  19. 19.
    Geert, H.: Cultural and Organizations - Software of the Mind - Intercultural Cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geert, H.: Geert Hofstede Analysis (2003) (visited October 2, 2004), http://www.cyborlink.com/besite/hofstede.htm
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Harris, Westin: The Equifax Canada Report on Consumers and Privacy in the Information Age, Equifax Canada (1992)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harris Interactive for The Privacy Leadership Initiative (PLI). A survey of consumer privacy attitudes and behavior (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harris Interactive for The Privacy Leadership Initiative (PLI). Consumer Privacy Attitudes and Behaviors Survey - Wave II (July 2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harris Interactive. Harris Interactive Poll on Surveillance Issues. 1,010 respondents (March 19, 2003, visited on August 18, 2004), http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=365
  26. 26.
    Harris Interactive. Privacy On and Off the Internet: what consumers want. Privacy & American Business (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harris, L., Westin, A.F., et al:. E-Commerce & Privacy: What Net users want. Sponsored by Privacy & American Business and Price Waterhouse, Inc. (June 1998) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Michael, H.: International Privacy, Publicity and Personality Laws, pp. 233–250. Reed Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Higher Secondary (HSC) Merit List for 2004. Fergusson College (visited November 15, 2004), http://www.fergusson.edu/notices/2004/june/hscmeritlist.asp
  30. 30.
    Indian Child. Population of India (visited November 10, 2004), http://www.indianchild.com/population_of_india.htm
  31. 31.
    Information and Privacy Commisioner, Ontario. A Report to the 22nd International Conference of Data Protection Commissioners (September 2000) (visited on April 30, 2005), http://www.ipc.on.ca/scripts/index_.asp?action=31&P_ID=11425&N_ID=1&PT_ID=11351&U_ID=0
  32. 32.
    International Research Associates for the European Commission Directorate General Internal Market and Financial Services. Information Technology and Data Privacy. Eurobarometer 46.1 (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Indicators 2003. * STARS Version 4.2, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    International Telecommunication Union. ICT Free Statistics (visited October 2, 2004), http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/
  35. 35.
    Johnson-Laird, P.: Mental Models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harris, L., Westin, A.F., et al.: Health Information Privacy Survey. for Equifax Inc. 1,000 adults of the national public (1993)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ray, M., Merchant, K.: Fortress India plan to combat online crime. The Financial Times (April 2005) (visited April 23, 2004), http://news.ft.com/cms/s/ac5fb49a-abb9-11d9-893c-00000e2511c8.html
  38. 38.
    Mead, H.G.: Mind, Self and Society. University of Chicago Press, IL (1962)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Milberg, S.J., et al.: Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organizational Science, 2000 INFORMS 11(1), 35–57 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Milberg, S.J., et al.: Values, personal information privacy and regulatory approaches. Communications of the ACM 38(12) (December 1995)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Overby, S.: India to Adopt Data Privacy Rules. CIO Magazine (September 1, 2003), http://www.cio.com/archive/090103/tl_data.html
  42. 42.
    Pandit, S.: The law isn’t much help. The Times of India (January 15, 2005), http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/991390.cms
  43. 43.
    Privacy International. Country reports - Republic of India (visited October 2004), http://www.privacyinternational.org/survey/phr2000/countrieshp.html#Heading3
  44. 44.
    John, R.: Source code stolen from U.S. software company in India. Infoworld (August 05, 2004), http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/05/HNcodestolen_1.html
  45. 45.
    Roy Morgan Research. Privacy and the community. Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner (July 2001), http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/rcommunity.html
  46. 46.
    Roy Morgan Research for The Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner. Community Attitudes Towards Privacy 2004 (visited April 20, 2004), http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/rcommunity/index_print.html
  47. 47.
    Suraiya, J., Vikas, S.: The death of privacy. Times of India (January 15, 2005), http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/991395.cms
  48. 48.
    The Joint Family, Encyclopedia Britannica Premium Service (visited October 18, 2004), http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=26070
  49. 49.
    The World Fact Book. India (visited on November 25, 2004), http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/in.html
  50. 50.
    Turner, C., Martin, E. (eds.): Surveying Subjective Phenomena. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alan, W.: Center for Social & Legal Research. Bibliography of surveys of the U.S. Public, 1970 – 2003 (visited on August 15, 2004), http://www.privacyexchange.org/iss/surveys/surveybibliography603.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
    • 1
  • Lorrie Cranor
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations