Advertisement

Prospective Analysis of Cooperative Provision of Industrial Services Using Coloured Petri Nets

  • Katrin Winkelmann
  • Holger Luczak
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4024)

Abstract

International customer demands in the capital goods industry force providers of industrial services to be present on a global market. Often this can only be realised efficiently by cooperating with other partners. But the process to configure a cooperation and choose an adequate cooperation alternative still lacks adequate support. Existing approaches to evaluate services or cooperation are not suitable for an assessment of different alternatives prior to their implementation. Simulation approaches for production networks on the other hand, cannot be used for industrial services. This paper deals with an approach to overcome this problem and presents a simulation model based on Petri net theory for the prospective analysis of cooperative provision of industrial services. To achieve this goal, a domain-specific conceptual model of cooperative provision of industrial services has been developed that considers the constitutive characteristics of industrial services and their cooperative provision and maps them onto the formal notation of coloured Petri nets to form an executable simulation model. As a result, machine and equipment producers will be able to assess their cooperation alternatives related to integrated service provision in advance and thus avoid cost-intensive false decisions.

Keywords

Prospective Analysis Service Order Industrial Service State Space Analysis Capital Good Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banks, J., Carson II, J.S., Nelson, B.L., Nicol, D.: Discrete-event System Simulation. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banks, J.: Principles of Simulation. In: Banks, J. (ed.) Handbook of Simulation, pp. 3–30. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bastian, M.: Modelle und Methoden in Problemlösungsprozessen. In: Luczak, H., Stich, V. (eds.) Betriebsorganisation im Unternehmen der Zukunft, pp. 285–289. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bienzeisler, B., Meiren, T.: Trendstudie Dienstleistungen. IAO, Stuttgart (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bornheim, M., Stüllenberg, F.: Effizienz- und Effektivitätssteuerung von Kooperationen mit Hilfe der Balanced Scorecard. Controlling 14(4/5), 283–289 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braun, J.: Veränderte Blickwinkel auf Unternehmen. In: Warnecke, H., Braun, J. (eds.) Vom Fraktal zum Produktionsnetzwerk, pp. 43–90. Springer, Berlin (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruhn, M.: Qualitätsmanagement für Dienstleistungen. Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CPN Tools (accessed March 27, 2006), http://wiki.daimi.au.dk/cpntools/
  9. 9.
    Corsten, H.: Dienstleistungs management. Oldenbourg, Wien (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DIHT (ed.): Services Going Abroad. Deutscher Industrie- und Handelstag, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DIN (ed.): Strukturmodell und Kriterien für die Auswahl und Bewertung investiver Dienstleistungen. PAS 1019. Beuth, Berlin (2002) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donabedian, A.: Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. In: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment, vol. 1. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Girault, C., Valk, R.: Petri Nets for Systems Engineering. Springer, Tokyo (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gulati, R., Nohria, N., Zaheer, A.: Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal 21, 203–215 (2000) (Special Issue)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hlubek, W., Pötzsch, G., Kesting, J.: Certified Service. In: Luczak, H., Stich, V. (eds.) Betriebsorganisation im Unternehmen der Zukunft, pp. 167–187. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoeck, H., Kutlina, Z.: Status quo und Perspektiven im Service 2004. Verlag Klinkenberg, Aachen (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jansen-Vullers, M.H., Reijers, H.A.: Business Process Redesign at a Mental Healthcare Institute: A Coloured Petri Net Approach. In: Jensen, K. (ed.) Sixth Workshop and Tutorial on Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets and the CPN Tools, Aarhus, Denmark, October 24-26, 2005, pp. 21–38. Computer Science Dept., Aarhus Univ., Aarhus (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen, K., Rozenberg, G.: High-level Petri Nets. Springer, Berlin (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jensen, K.: Coloured Petri Nets, vol. 1-3. Springer, Berlin (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kallenberg, R.: Ein Referenzmodell für den Service in Unternehmen des Maschinenbaus. Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss. (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laughery, R., Plott, B., Scott-Nash, S.: Simulation of Service Systems. In: Banks, J. (ed.) Handbook of Simulation, pp. 629–644. Wiley, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Licht, T., Dohmen, L., Schmitz, P., Schmidt, L., Luczak, H.: Person-Centered Simulation of Product Development Processes Using Timed Stochastic Coloured Petri Nets. In: Geril, P. (ed.) Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference, ESM 2004, October 25-27, Paris, EUROSIS-ETI, Ghent, Belgien, pp. 188–195 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luczak, H., Drews, P. (eds.): Praxishandbuch Service-Benchmarking. Service Verlag Fischer, Landsberg (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luczak, H., Winkelmann, K., Hoeck, H.: Internationalisierung von industriellen Dienstleis- tungen. In: Bruhn, M., Stauss, B. (eds.) Internationalisierung von Dienstleistungen, Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 389–413 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merkle, M.: Bewertung von Unternehmensnetzwerken. St. Gallen, Univ., Diss. (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mjema, E.: A Simulation Based Method for Determination of Personnel Capacity Requirement in the Maintenance Department. Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss. (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naylor, T.H., Finger, J.M.: Verification of Computer Simulation Models. Management Science (2), B-92–B-101 (1967)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peterson, J.L.: Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pritsker, A.A.B.: Principles of Simulation Modeling. In: Banks, J. (ed.) Handbook of Simulation, pp. 31–51. Wiley, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robinson, S.: Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. Wiley, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schlick, C., Reuth, R., Luczak, H.: A Comparative Simulation Study of Work Processes in Autonomous Production Cells. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 12(1), 31–54 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Seel, C.: Visuelle Simulation von Dienstleistungsprozessen. Saarbrücken, Univ., Diss. (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sontow, K.: Dienstleistungsplanung in Unternehmen des Maschinen- und Anlagenbaus. Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss. (2000)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sydow, J.: Network Development by Means of Network Evaluation? Human Relations 57(2) (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhou, M., Venkatesh, K.: Modeling, Simulation and Control of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. World Scientific, Singapore (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3), 5–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business Process Management Demystified. Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Putting Petri Nets to Work in the Workflow Arena. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Colom, J.-M., Kordon, F., Kostis, G., Moldt, D. (eds.) Petri Net Approaches for Modelling and Validation, LINCOM Europa, München, pp. 125–143 (2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    VDI (ed.): Richtlinie 2893: Auswahl und Bildung von Kennzahlen für die Instandhaltung, VDI-Handbuch Betriebstechnik, Teil 4 - Betriebsüberwachung/Instandhaltung. Beuth, Berlin (2003) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang, J.: Timed Petri Nets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Welch, P.D.: The Statistical Analysis of Simulation Results. In: Lavenberg, S.S. (ed.) Computer Performance Modeling Handbook, pp. 267–329. Academic Press, San Diego (1983)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Westergaard, M., Lassen, K.B.: Building and Deploying Visualizations of Coloured Petri Net Models Using BRITNeY Animation and CPN Tools. In: Jensen, K. (ed.) Sixth Workshop and Tutorial on Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets and the CPN Tools, Aarhus, Denmark, October 24-26, 2005, pp. 119–135. Computer Science Dept., Aarhus Univ., Aarhus (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Winkelmann, K.: Application of Coloured Petri Nets in Cooperative Provision of Industrial Services. In: Jensen, K. (ed.) Sixth Workshop and Tutorial on Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets and the CPN Tools, Aarhus, Denmark, October 24-26, 2005, pp. 285–300. Computer Science Dept., Aarhus Univ., Aarhus (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wise, R., Baumgartner, R.: Go Downstream. Harvard Business Review 77(5), 133–144 (1999)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zahn, E., Stanik, M.: Wie Dienstleister gemeinsam den Erfolg suchen. In: Bruhn, M., Stauss, B. (eds.) Dienstleistungsnetzwerke, Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 593–612 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Winkelmann
    • 1
  • Holger Luczak
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Operations Management at Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations