Abstract
This paper presents an investigation into why software engineers do not keep to the principle of separating business logic from display. The concept of method rationale is used to establish what is supposed to be achieved by following the principle. The resulting model is then contrasted with results from in-depth interviews with practicing engineers about what they want to achieve. The difference between what the principle advocates and what engineers consider beneficial holds the answer to why the principle of separating business logic from display is not maintained. The results suggest that many espoused benefits of the principle do not appeal to engineers in practice and the principle is tailored to make it more useful in particular contexts. Tailoring the principle also brought about other benefits, not explicated by the principle, thus reinforcing the idea that method tailoring is crucial to the successful enactment of information systems engineering methods.
This work has been financially supported by the Science Foundation Ireland Principal Investigator projects B4-STEP and Lero, and the EU FP6 Project COSPA.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Ågerfalk, P.J., Åhlgren, K.: Modeling the Rationale of Methods. In: Khosrowpour, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th Information Resources Management Association International Conference, pp. 184–190 (1999)
Ågerfalk, P.J., Fitzgerald, B.: Methods as Action Knowledge: Exploring the Concept of Method Rationale in Method Construction, Tailoring and Use. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Siau, K. (eds.) Proceedings of EMMSAD 2005, pp. 413–426 (2005)
Ågerfalk, P.J., Wistrand, K.: Systems Development Method Rationale: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis. In: Proc. 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003), pp. 185–190 (2003)
Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., Harmsen, F.: Meta-Modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering. Information Systems 24, 209–228 (1999)
Dewan, P.: Teaching Inter-Object Design Patterns to Freshmen. In: Proc. SIGCSE 2005 (2005)
Fitzgerald, B.: The Use of Systems Development Methodologies in Practice: A Field Study. Information Systems Journal 6, 201–212 (1997)
Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N.L., Stolterman, E.: Information Systems Development: Methods in Action. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire (2002)
Forsberg, C., Sjöström, A.: Pocket PC Development in the Enterprise. Addison Wesley, London (2002)
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns, Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design Theories in Information Systems: A Need for Multi-Grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6, 59–62 (2004)
Goldkuhl, G., Röstlinger, A.: Joint Elicitation of Problems: An Important Aspect of Change Analysis. In: Avison, D.E., Kendall, J.E., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) IFIP WG8.2 on Human, Social, and Organizational Aspects of Information Systems Development, pp. 107–125 (1993)
Jayaratna, N.: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies. McGraw-Hill, London (1994)
Karlsson, F.: Method Configuration, Method and Computerized Tool Support. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Linköping (2005)
Levi, N.: Java 2 Web Developer Cerification Study Guide, SYBEX inc., Alameda, California, USA (2003)
Lings, B., Lundell, B.: Method-in Action and Method-in-Tool: Some Implications for CASE. In: Proc. 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2004), pp. 623–628 (2004)
Nash, M.: Java Frameworks and Components: Accelerate Your Web Application Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Parnas, D.L.: On the Criteria to Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules. Communications of the ACM 15, 1053–1058 (1972)
Parnas, D.L., Clements, P.C.: A Rational Design Process: How and Why to Fake It. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12, 251–257 (1986)
Parr, T.: Enforcing Strict Model-View Separation in Template Engines. In: Proc. WWW 2004. ACM, New York (2004)
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park California (1990)
Pree, W.: Design Patterns for Object-Oriented Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Riemenschneider, C.K., Hardgrave, B.C., Davis, F.D.: Explaining Software Development Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28, 1135–1145 (2002)
Rogue Wave Software, I.: Distributed MVC: An Architecture for Windows DNA Applications. Boulder, Colorado (1999)
Rossi, M., Ramesh, B., Lyytinen, K., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5, 356–391 (2004)
Russo, N.L., Stolterman, E.: Exploring the Assumptions Underlying Information Systems Methodologies. Information Technology & People 13, 313–327 (2000)
Stolterman, E., Russo, N.L.: The Paradox of Information Systems Methods: Public and Private Rationality. In: Proc. The British Computer Society 5th Annual Conference on Methodologies (1997)
Sun Microsystems, I. Java Blueprints: Model-View-Controller. Sun Microsystems, Inc. [Online], Available: http://java.sun.com/blueprints/patterns/MVC-detailed.html
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edn. SAGE, London (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Häggmark, M., Ågerfalk, P.J. (2006). Why Software Engineers Do Not Keep to the Principle of Separating Business Logic from Display: A Method Rationale Analysis. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4001. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767138_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11767138_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34652-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34653-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)