Advertisement

Landscape Maps for Enterprise Architectures

  • Leendert van der Torre
  • Marc M. Lankhorst
  • Hugo ter Doest
  • Jan T. P. Campschroer
  • Farhad Arbab
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4001)

Abstract

Landscape maps are a technique for visualizing enterprise architectures. They present architectural elements in the form of an easy to understand 2D ’map’. A landscape map view on architectures provides non-technical stakeholders, such as managers, with a high-level overview, without burdening them with technicalities of architectural drawings. In this paper we discuss the use of and techniques for landscape maps. A formal model for landscape maps is introduced as the basis of visualization and interaction techniques. Moreover, we show how a landscape map can be generated from its underlying model. Finally we show several interaction techniques, for example to build a landscape map from scratch, independently of an underlying model, or to change a landscape map together with its underlying model.

Keywords

Business Process Call Center Object Constraint Language Interaction Technique Enterprise Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Groenewegen, L., Stam, A., Stevens, S., van der Torre, L.: Change impact analysis of enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Jacob, J., Stam, A., van der Torre, L.: A logical viewpoint on architectures. In: Proceedings of EDOC 2004, pp. 73–83. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Jacob, J., Stam, A., van der Torre, L.: Enterprise architecture analysis with XML. In: Proceedings of 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., Nuseibeh, B., Finkelstein, L., Goedicke, M.: Viewpoints: A framework for multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 2(1), 31–57 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., van Buuren, R., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Bonsangue, M., van der Torre, L.: Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13(3), 257–287 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleppe, A., Warmer, J.: The object constraint language and its application in the UML metamodel. In: Bézivin, J., Muller, P.-A. (eds.) UML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1618. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lankhorst, M., et al.: Enterprise Architecture At Work. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lassing, N., Rijsenbrij, D., van Vliet, H.: Viewpoints on modifiability. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 11(4), 453–478 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S., Russo, A.: Making inconsistency respectable in software development. Journal of Systems and Software 56(11) (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Std 1472-2000: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stam, A., Jacob, J., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., van der Torre, L.: Using XML transformations for enterprise architectures. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2004. LNCS, vol. 4313, pp. 42–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Sanden, W.A.M., Bergman, P., Campschroer, J.T.P., de Reus, H.R.: Realisatie van flexibele informatievoorziening (in dutch). Informatie 41, 58–65 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Sanden, W.A.M., Sturm, B.J.A.M.: Informatiearchitectuur, de infrastructurele benadering (in dutch) (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Leeuwen, J. (ed.): Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B: Formal Methods and Semantics, Amsterdam (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leendert van der Torre
    • 1
  • Marc M. Lankhorst
    • 2
  • Hugo ter Doest
    • 2
  • Jan T. P. Campschroer
    • 3
  • Farhad Arbab
    • 4
  1. 1.University of LuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.Telematica InstituutEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.OrdinaThe Netherlands
  4. 4.CWIAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations