Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Knowledge Representation Based on Ontology in Ontoweb System

  • Tania C. D. Bueno
  • Sonali Bedin
  • Fabricia Cancellier
  • Hugo C. Hoeschl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4027)


In the past few years, several studies have emphasized the use of ontologies as an alternative to information organization. The notion of ontology has become popular in fields such as intelligent information integration, information retrieval on the Internet, and knowledge management. Different groups use different approaches to develop and verify de effectiveness of ontologies [1] [2] [3]. This diversity can be a factor that makes it difficult the formularization of formal methodologies of evaluation. This paper seeks to provide a way to identify the effectiveness of the knowledge representation based on ontology that was developed trough Knowledge Based System tools. The reason for that is because all processing and storage of gathered information and knowledge base organization is done using this structure. Our evaluation is based on case studies in the Ontoweb system [4], involving real world ontology for money laundry domain. Our results indicate that modification of ontology structure can effectively reveal faults, as long as they adversely affect the program state.


Knowledge Representation Money Laundering Bank Secrecy Knowledge Engineer Ontology Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Duineveld, A.J., et al.: WonderTools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools. In: Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Voyager Inn, Banff, Alberta, Canada (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eriksson, H., et al.: Automatic Generation of Ontology Editors. In: Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Voyager Inn, Banff, Alberta, Canada (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamins, V.R.: The ontological engineering initiative (KA)2, Formal Ontology in Information systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ontoweb (2006), Available at: http://www.wbsa.com.br (access on January 02, 2006)
  5. 5.
    Ribeiro, M.S.: KMAI, da RC2D à PCE. Gestão do conhecimento com inteligência artificial, da representação do conhecimento contextualizado dinamicamente à pesquisa contextual estruturada [2004]. In: Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Völker, J., Vrandečić, D., Sure, Y.: Automatic Evaluation of Ontologies (AEON). In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 716–731. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bueno, T.C.D., et al.: Knowledge Engineering Suite: A Tool to Create Ontologies for Automatic Knowledge Representation in Knowledge-Based Systems. In: Wimmer, M.A., Traunmüller, R., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds.) EGOV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3591, pp. 249–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoeschl, H.C., et al.: Structured Contextual Search For The Un Security Council. In: Proceedings of the fifth International Conference On Enterprise Information Systems. Anger, France, vol. 2, pp. 100–107.6 (2003); Bueno, T.C.D. et al.: JurisConsulto: Retrieval in Jurisprudencial Text Bases using Juridical Terminology. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference On Artificial Intelligence And Law. ACM, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faatz, A., Steinmetz, R.: Ontology Enrichment Evaluation. LNCS, vol. 3257, pp. 497–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania C. D. Bueno
    • 2
  • Sonali Bedin
    • 1
  • Fabricia Cancellier
    • 2
  • Hugo C. Hoeschl
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Governo Eletrônico, Inteligência Jurídica e Sistemas – IJURISFlorianópolisBrasil
  2. 2.WBSA Sistemas Inteligentes SA, Parque Tecnológico Alfa, Centro de, Tecnologia IlhaSoftFlorianópolisBrasil

Personalised recommendations