Advertisement

Investigation of the Biomechanic Function of Cruciate Ligaments Using Kinematics and Geometries from a Living Subject During Step Up/Down Motor Task

  • Luigi Bertozzi
  • Rita Stagni
  • Silvia Fantozzi
  • Angelo Cappello
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3994)

Abstract

The modeling approach is the only possible way to estimate the biomechanic function of the different anatomical sub-structures of the knee joint in physiological conditions. Subject-specific geometry and kinematic data were the foundations of the 3D quasi-static model adopted for the present work. A previously validated cruciate ligaments model was implemented taking the anatomical twist of the fibers into account. The anatomical load components, developed by the modeled ligaments, were estimated during step up/down motor tasks. The anterior cruciate ligament never developed force, along every directions. The posterior cruciate ligament developed increasing forces with the increasing of the flexion angle until at about 70° of flexion. Bigger repeatability in the force curves was obtained in extension with respect to the flexion movement. In conclusion the proposed model was effective in evaluating loads in the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament during the execution of daily living activities.

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Cruciate Ligament Posterior Cruciate Ligament Motor Task Total Knee Replacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    AAOS. Internet site address, http://www.aaos.org
  2. 2.
    Zavatsky, A.B., O’Connor, J.J.: A model of human knee ligaments in the sagittal plane. Part 1: Response to passive flexion. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 206, 125–134 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zavatsky, A.B., O’Connor, J.J.: A model of human knee ligaments in the sagittal plane. Part 2: Fibre recruitment under load. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 206, 135–145 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gill, H.S., O’Connor, J.J.: Biarticulating two-dimensional computer model of the human patellofemoral joint. Clin. Biomech. 11, 81–89 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, T.W., O’Connor, J.J.: Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-bearing structures crossing the human knee joint: comparison between theory and experiment. J. Anat. 189(Pt. 3), 575–585 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zavatsky, A.B., Wright, H.J.: Injury initiation and progression in the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin. Biomech. 16, 47–53 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zavatsky, A.B., O’Connor, J.J.: Ligament forces at the knee during isometric quadriceps contractions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 207, 7–18 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shelburne, K.B., Pandy, M.G.: A musculoskeletal model of the knee for evaluating ligament forces during isometric contractions. J. Biomech. 30, 163–176 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wismans, J., Veldpaus, F., Janssen, J., Huson, A., Struben, P.: A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint. J. Biomech. 13, 677–685 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blankevoort, L., Kuiper, J.H., Huiskes, R., Grootenboer, H.J.: Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J. Biomech. 24, 1019–1031 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mommersteeg, T.J., Huiskes, R., Blankevoort, L., Kooloos, J.G., Kauer, J.M.: An inverse dynamics modeling approach to determine the restraining function of human knee ligament bundles. J. Biomech. 30, 139–146 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moglo, K.E., Shirazi-Adl, A.: Cruciate coupling and screw-home mechanism in passive knee joint during extension—flexion. J. Biomech. 38, 1075–1083 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piazza, S.J., Delp, S.L.: Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of total knee replacement motion during a step-up task. J. Biomech. Eng. 123, 599–606 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stagni, R., Fantozzi, S., Davinelli, M., Lannocca, M.: Comparison of knee cruciate ligaments models using kinematics from a living subject during chair rising-sitting. In: Bubak, M., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J. (eds.) ICCS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3039, pp. 1073–1080. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bookstein, F.L.: Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 567–585 (1989)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mommersteeg, T.J., Kooloos, J.G., Blankevoort, L., Kauer, J.M., Huiskes, R., Roeling, F.Q.: The fibre bundle anatomy of human cruciate ligaments. J. Anat. 187(Pt. 2), 461–471 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuffi, S., Leardini, A., Catani, F., Fantozzi, S., Cappello, A.: A model-based method for the reconstruction of total knee replacement kinematics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 981–991 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodfellow, J., O’Connor, J.: The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 60-B, 358–369 (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bertozzi, L., Stagni, R., Fantozzi, S., Cappello, A.: 3D subject-specific model of the human knee from in-vivo measurements: validation on the knee drawer test. In submission to the Med. Eng. Phys.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Bertozzi
    • 1
  • Rita Stagni
    • 2
  • Silvia Fantozzi
    • 2
  • Angelo Cappello
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electronics, Informatics and Computer ScienceUniversity of BolognaCesenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Electronics, Informatics and Computer ScienceUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations