Advertisement

Computational Analysis and Simulation of Vacuum Infusion Molding Process

  • Young Seok Song
  • Taikyeong T. Jeong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3993)

Abstract

The current work focuses on resin bleeding process during the Seeman composite resin infusion molding process (SCRIMP), which is a subset of liquid composite molding (LCM) process. Finite difference method (FDM) is implemented to predict the preform thickness, bleeding resin volume, and fiber volume fraction by using a non-rigid control volume. After the fibrous preform is completely impregnated, the resin flow within the preform has a great impact on the dimension and mechanical properties of the final composite parts. As the resin flows out of the preform, the resin pressure and preform thickness are reduced, which increases the fiber volume fraction and the dimension tolerance of the preform.

In this paper, the influence of resin flow rate at vent in the mold is also investigated. It is found that there is a critical flow rate to optimize the SCRIMP process at the vacuum line.

Keywords

Control Volume Fiber Volume Fraction Void Content Infusion Line Resin Transfer Molding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewit, S.M., Jakubowski, J.C.: Low cost VARTM process for commercial and military applications. In: 42nd International SAMPE Symposium, May 4-8, vol. 42, pp. 1173–1187 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joubaud, L., Achim, V., Trochu, F.: Numerical simulation of resin infusion and reinforcement consolidation under flexible cover. Polym. Compos. 26, 417–427 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song, Y.S., Chung, K., Kang, T.J., Youn, J.R.: Prediction of permeability tensor for three dimensional circular braided preform by applying a finite volume method to a unit cell. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 1629–1636 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beckwith, S.W., Hyland, C.R.: Resin transfer molding: a decade of technology advances. SAMPE Journal 34, 7–19 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang, M.K., Lee, W.I., Hahn, H.T.: Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Phys. Lett. A 329, 207–213 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gotowski, T.G., Dillon, G.: The elastic deformation of fiber bundles, Advanced composite manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathur, R., Heider, D., Hoffmann, C., Gillespie, J.W., Advani, S.G., Fink, B.K.: Flow front measurements and model validation in the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. Polym. Compos. 22, 477–490 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, Y., Chui, W., Glimm, J., Lindquist, B., Tangerman, F.: Applications of front tracking to the simulation of resin transfer molding. Computers Math. Applic. 33, 47 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeong, T., Ambler, A.: Design trade-offs and power reduction techniques for high performance circuits and system. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) ISSN: 0302-9743Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni, J., Zhao, Y., Lee, L.J., Nakamura, S.: Analysis of two-regional flow in liquid composite molding. Polym. Compos. 18, 254 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Young Seok Song
    • 1
  • Taikyeong T. Jeong
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Composite Materials, University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations