Persuasive GERONtechnology: Reaping Technology’s Coaching Benefits at Older Age
The keynote speaker for this conference, Dr. B.J. Fogg, defines persuasive technology as, “interactive computing systems designed to change people’s attitudes and behaviors.” . Such changes find their origin in changes in people’s motivation. The coaching possibilities of technology may be viewed as an embellishment of conditioning and behavior therapy.
With respect to aging, most people want to live a long life—indeed as long as possible—but they don’t want to grow old. Literally dozens of formal and informal surveys about the ambitions and desired activities of old people have been performed . The results highlight the desire of older persons to maintain their accustomed way of life, maintain and identify new social contacts; and identify and develop new recreational, educational and artistic activities, some that replace or modify earlier ones associated with family and work.
With this background in mind, we will discuss persuasive technology as coaching benefits in relation to the ambitions, activities and wisdom of people as they age.
KeywordsCellular Telephone Assisted Live Facility Persuasive Technology Keynote Speaker Health Insurance Premium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
- 2.Mollenkopf, H., Fozard, J.L.: Technology and the good life: Challenges for current and future generations of older people. In: Wahl, H.-W., Scheidt, R.J., Windley, P.G. (eds.) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. 23, pp. 250–279. Springer, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.van Bronswijk, J.E.M.H., Bouma, H., Fozard, J.L.: Linking the impacts of technology to its areas of application that most affect quality of life. Gerontechnology, 169–172 (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Fozard, J.L.: Impacts of technology interventions on health and self-esteem. Gerontechnology, 463–476 (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Roy, N., Thrun, S., Varma, V.: Experiences with a mobile robotic guide for he elderly. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 2003, AAAI, Menlo Park (2003)Google Scholar
- 6.Yoshima, T., Matsuhira, N., Suzuke, K., Yamamoto, D., Ozake, F., Hirokawa, J., Ogawa, H.: Development of a concept model of a robotic information home appliance, ApriAlpha. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEEmSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai JP, September 29-October 2 (2004)Google Scholar
- 7.Husemann, D., Narayanaswami, C., Nidd, M.: Personal mobile hub. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC 2004, pp. 43–49 (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Bigelow, J.H., Cretin, S., Solomon, M.D., Wu, S., Cherry, J., Cobb, H., O’Connell, M.: Patient compliance with and attitudes toward Health Buddy TM, (downloaded on 1/26/06), http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographreports/MR1232/
- 9.Patterson, C., Etzoni, O., Fox, D., Kautz, H.: The Activity Compass. In: Proceedings of UbiCog 2002: First International Workshop on Ubiquitous Comuputing for Cognitive Aids, Gothenberg, Sweden (downloaded on 1/26/06), http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/dip3/AI/-AssistedCognition/publications/compass03.doc
- 10.Fozard, J.L., Kearns, W.D.: Impacts of technology interventions on communication in aging and aged persons. In: Lesnoff, G. (ed.) Gerontechnology, Springfield IL, C. Thomas (in press)Google Scholar
- 11.Heeter, C., Gregg, J., Climo, J., Biocca, F., Dekker, D.: Telewindows: Case studies in asymmetrical social presence. In: Riva, G., Davide, F., IJsselsteijn, W.A. (eds.) Being there: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments, vol. 5, pp. 279–294. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bouwhuis, D.G., Melenhorst, A.-S.: Perceived cost-benefit ratios of using interactive communication equipment. In: Sagawa, K., Bouma, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Gerontechnology, Tsukuba JP, National Institute of Bioscience and Human-Technology, March 2001, pp. 75–78 (2001)Google Scholar