B-EDCA: A New IEEE 802.11e-Based QoS Protocol for Multimedia Wireless Communications

  • José Villalón
  • Pedro Cuenca
  • Luis Orozco-Barbosa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3976)


The IEEE 802.11e draft standard is a proposal defining the mecha-nisms for wireless LANs aiming to provide QoS support to time-sensitive applications. However, recent studies have shown that the IEEE 802.11e (EDCA) performs poorly when the medium is highly loaded due to the high collision rate. Even though several proposals have been proposed to address this problem, they require important changes to the current standard specifications making difficult their actual implementation. In this paper, we propose a simple QoS-aware mechanism and fully compatible with the various operation modes of the EDCA standard as well as the legacy IEEE 802.11 (DCF) scheme. Our design has been based on an in-depth analysis of the several operation modes of both standards. This should ensure full compatibility of operation: an important feature since the transition from the IEEE 802.11 to the IEEE 802.11e will take some time making more likely the existence of hybrid scenarios where both standards will have to coexist. Our simulation results show that our new scheme outperforms the EDCA and other QoS-aware schemes recently reported in the literature.


Medium Access Control Packet Loss Rate Distribute Coordination Function Enhance Distribute Channel Access Video Traffic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, ANSI/IEEE Std 802.11. “Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications”, Edition (1999) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE 802 Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. IEEE P802.11e/D13.0 Draft Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Medium Access Control (MAC) Quality of Service (QoS) Enhancements (April 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Micó, F., Cuenca, P., Orozco-Barbosa, L.: QoS mechanisms for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. In: Mammeri, Z., Lorenz, P. (eds.) HSNMC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3079, pp. 609–623. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Villalón, J., Cuenca, P., Orozco-Barbosa, L.: QoS Provisioning Mechanisms for IEEE 802.11 WLAN: A Performance Evaluation. In: Proceedings of 10th IFIP International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications, Colmar (August 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindgren, A., Almquist, A., Schelén, O.: Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE 802.11 Wireless LANs - An Evaluation. Journal of Special Topics in Mobile Networking and Applications (MONET) 8(3), 223–235 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pattara-Atikom, W., Krishnamurthy, P., Banerjee, S.: Distributed Mechanisms for Quality of Service in Wireless LANs. IEEE Wireless Communications 10(3), 26–34 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwon, Y., Fang, Y., Latchman, H.: Design of MAC Protocols with Fast Collision Resolution for Wireless Local Area Networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 3(3), 793–807 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romdhani, L., Ni, Q., Turletti, T.: Adaptive EDCF: Enhanced Service Differentiation for IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE WCNC, New Orleans, pp. 1373–1378 (March 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malli, M., Ni, Q., Turletti, T., Barakat, C.: Adaptive Fair Channel Allocation for QoS Enhancement in IEEE 802.11 Wireless LANs. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Paris (June 2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Villalón, J., Cuenca, P., Orozco-Barbosa, L.: On the effectiveness of IEEE 802.11e qoS support in wireless LAN: A performance analysis. In: Yang, L.T., Rana, O.F., Di Martino, B., Dongarra, J. (eds.) HPCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3726, pp. 605–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Opnet.Technologies.Inc. OPNET Modeler 10.0 (1987-2004), http://www.opnet.com
  12. 12.
    ITU-T Recommendation G.728, “Coding of Speech at 16 kbit/s using Low-Delay Code Excited Linear Prediction”, Std. (September 1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ITU-T Recommendation H.264, “Advanced Video Coding For Generic Audiovisual Services” (May 2003) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Villalón
    • 1
  • Pedro Cuenca
    • 1
  • Luis Orozco-Barbosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Albacete Research Institute of InformaticsUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaAlbaceteSpain

Personalised recommendations