Advertisement

Communicating Distributed H Systems: Optimal Results with Efficient Ways of Communication

  • Shankara Narayanan Krishna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3892)

Abstract

Distributed H systems and several variants of distributed H systems have been studied extensively [1, 2, 3, 4]. This paper is an effort in the direction of obtaining efficient distributed systems. To this end, a universality result using 2 components is obtained using two-level distributed H systems. This is an improvement over the existing universality result with 3 components. Further, we propose lazy communicating distributed H systems (LCDH systems), a variant of communicating distributed H systems, with lesser communication. A universality result is obtained with this variant, using only 2 components. This improves the universality result RE = CDH 3 by reducing the number of components as well as the communication between components.

Keywords

Internal Rule Selector Versus Active String Splice System Enumerable Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Csuhaj-Varju, E., Kari, L., Păun, G.: Test tube distributed systems based on splicing. Computers and AI 15(5), 419–436 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Păun, G.: Two-level distributed H systems. In: Proc. of the Third Conf. on Developments in Language Theory, pp. 309–327. Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Păun, G.: DNA Computing: Distributed splicing systems. In: Mycielski, J., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Structures in Logic and Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 1261, pp. 351–370. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Păun, G., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A.: DNA Computing: New Computing Paradigms. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Priese, L., Rogozhin, Y., Margenstern, M.: Finite H systems with 3 tubes are not predictable. In: Altman, R.B., Dunker, A.K., Hunter, L., Klein, T.E. (eds.) Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Hawaii, 1998, pp. 547–558. World Sci., Singapore (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zandron, C., Ferretti, C., Mauri, G.: A reduced distributed splicing system for RE languages. In: Păun, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) New Trends in Formal Languages. LNCS, vol. 1218, pp. 346–366. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shankara Narayanan Krishna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyPowai, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations