Behaviour Flexibility in Dynamic and Unpredictable Environments: The ICagent Approach

  • Vangelis Kourakos-Mavromichalis
  • George Vouros
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3955)


Several agent frameworks have been proposed for developing intelligent software agents and multi-agent systems that are able to perform in dynamic environments. These frameworks and architectures exploit specific reasoning tasks (such as option selection, desire filtering, plan elaboration and means-end reasoning) that support agents to react, deliberate and/or interact/cooperate with other agents. Such reasoning tasks are realized by means of specific modules that agents may trigger according to circumstances, switching their behaviour between predefined discrete behavioural modes. This paper presents the facilities provided by the non-layered BDI-architecture of ICagent for supporting performance in dynamic and unpredictable multi-agent environments through efficient balancing between behavioural modes in a continuous space. This space is circumscribed by the purely (individual) reactive, the purely (individual) deliberative and the social deliberative behavioural modes.  In a greater extend than existing frameworks; ICagent relates agent’s flexible behaviour to cognition and sociability, supporting the management of plans constructed by the agent’s mental and domain actions in a coordinated manner.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Atkin, M., Westbrook, D., Cohen, P.: Capture the Flag: Military Simulation Meets Computer Games. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on AI and Computer Games (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkhard, H., Hannebauer, M.: AT Humboldt - Development, Practice and Theory. In: Proc. First International Workshop on RoboCup. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J., Pollack, M.E.: Plans and Resource-Bounded Practical Reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4(3), 349–355 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence 86(2), 269–357 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: The Evolution of SharedPlans. In: Rao, A., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Foundations and Theories of Rational Agencies, pp. 227–262 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    d’Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M., Wooldridge, M.: A formal specification of dMARS. Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Technical Note 72 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kourakos-Mavromichalis, V., Vouros, G.: Building Intelligent Collaborative Interface Agents with the IC AGENT Framework. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems, Springer (accepted, November 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mavromichalis, V.K., Vouros, G.: Balancing between Reactivity and Deliberation in the IC AGENT Framework. In: Hannebauer, M., Wendler, J., Pagello, E. (eds.) ECAI-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 2103, pp. 53–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Müller, J.P.: The Design of Intelligent Agents. LNCS, vol. 1177. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demetriou, N., Kakas, A., Torroni, P.: Agent Planning, Negotiation, and Control of Operation. In: de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Biennal European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain (August 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pollack, M.E., Horty, J.F.: There’s More to Life than Making Plans: Plan Management in Dynamic, Multi-agent Environments. AAAI Magazine 20(4) (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pollack, M.E., Ringuette, M.: Introducing the Tileworld: Experimentally Evaluating Agent Architectures. In: Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 183–189. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, Calif (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss, G.: Cognition, sociability, and constraints. In: Hannebauer, M., Wendler, J., Pagello, E. (eds.) ECAI-WS 2000. LNCS, vol. 2103, p. 217. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vangelis Kourakos-Mavromichalis
    • 1
  • George Vouros
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Information and Communication Systems EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanKarlovassi, SamosGreece

Personalised recommendations