Unifying Grid Metadata Representations Through Ontologies

  • Bartosz Kryza
  • Marta Majewska
  • Renata Słota
  • Jacek Kitowski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3911)


Grid environments provide now variety of middleware solutions that are supposed to help manage resources available in the Grid environment. In this paper, the need for a more uniform way of defining metadata in the Grid is presented. A proposition for using ontologies as a formalism for unified representation of various kinds of metadata in the Grid is given. Also description of basic requirements that every Grid metadata approach should address and how these requirements can be fulfilled with ontologies is provided. Finally, a brief decription of example of such an approach taken in EU K-Wf Grid Project is described.


Ontology Domain Grid Environment Semantic Description Service Ontology Grid Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Quix, C.: Quality-oriented and metadata-driven integration in information grids. In: 2nd IST Workshop on Metadata Management in Grid and P2P Systems (MMGPS) - Models, Services, Architectures, London, UK (December 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster, I.T., Jennings, N.R., Kesselman, C.: Brain meets brawn: Why grid and agents need each other. In: 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - AAMAS, New York City, USA, July 2004, vol. 1, pp. 8–15 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inteligrid project homepage,
  4. 4.
    Ontogrid project homepage,
  5. 5.
    K-Wf Grid project homepage,
  6. 6.
    Globus Alliance, Globus Toolkit 2.2 MDS Technology Brief. On-line,
  7. 7.
    OASIS consortium, UDDI homepage, Online
  8. 8.
    Dutka, L., Kryza, B., Krawczyk, K., Slota, R., Majewska, M., Hluchy, L., Kitowski, J.: Component-expert architecture for supporting grid workflow construction based on knowledge. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) Innovation and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, October 2005, vol. 2, pp. 239–246. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF, Online
  10. 10.
    Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuiness, D.L.: OWL web ontology language guide, Online
  11. 11.
    Hobbs, J.R., Pan, F.: An ontology of time for the semantic web. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Processing (TALIP): Special issue on Temporal Information Processing 3, 66–85 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Origins of the standard upper merged ontology: A proposal for the IEEE standard upper ontology. In: Working Notes of the IJCAI-2001 Workshop on the IEEE Standard Upper Ontology, Seattle, Washington, USA (August 2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mika, P., Oberle, D., Gangemi, A., Sabou, M.: Foundations for service ontologies: Aligning owl-s to dolce. In: The Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference Proceedings, New York, NY, USA, May 2004, pp. 563–572 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin, D., et al.: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services,
  15. 15.
    Krawczyk, K., Slota, R., Majewska, M., Kryza, B., Kitowski, J.: Grid organization memory for knowledge management for grid environment. In: Proceedings of 4th Cracow Grid Workshop, Cracow, Poland, December 2004, ACK Cyfronet-AGH (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogsa-dai project homepage,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bartosz Kryza
    • 1
  • Marta Majewska
    • 2
  • Renata Słota
    • 2
  • Jacek Kitowski
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Academic Computer Center CYFRONET-AGHCracowPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceAGH, University of Science and TechnologyCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations