A Broker Based Architecture for Automated Discovery and Invocation of Stateful Services

  • Marian Babik
  • Ladislav Hluchy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3911)


Web Service Resource Framework (WSRF) is a recent effort of the grid community to facilitate modeling of the stateful services. Semantic Web Services initiative is proposing a standard called OWL-S to help the automated discovery, composition and invocation of the services. This article describes a broker based architecture, which tries to combine WSRF and OWL-S in a way to enable automated discovery and invocation of the stateful services. Analysis of the requirements are provided and an application scenario is described, which has been used to evaluate the architecture.


Automate Discovery Resource Property Globus Toolkit Datatype Property Stateless Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ankolekar, A., et al.: OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Service (2003),
  2. 2.
    Christensen, E., Cubera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, Technical report, WWW Consortium (2001),
  3. 3.
    Resource Description Framework,
  4. 4.
    Web Service Resource Framework,
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Knowledge Interchange Format, draft to American National Standard (1998),
  7. 7.
    Universal Description, Discovery and Integration Protocol Specification, UDDI Consortium (2001),
  8. 8.
    Balzer, S., Liebig, T., Wagner, M.: Pitfalls of OWL-S – A practical Semantic Web Use Case. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fikes, R., Jenkins, J., Frank, G.: JTP: A System Architecture and Component Library for Hybrid Reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Seventh World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, Orlando, Florida, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Extensible Markup Language (XML), XML Protocol Working Group (2004),
  11. 11.
    Fikes, R., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL-QL: A Language for Deductive Query Answering on the Semantic Web, KSL Technical Report 03-14 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srinivasan, N., Paolucci, M., Sycara, K.: Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paolucci, M., Soudry, J., Srinivasan, N., Sycara, K.: Untangling the Broker Paradox in OWL-S. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2004 Spring Symposium (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CrossGrid consortium, CrossGrid Technical Annex (2004),
  15. 15.
    Li, L., Horrocks, I.: A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology. In: Proc. of the Twelfth Inl. Word Wide Web Conference (WWW 2003), pp. 331–339. ACM, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Services Modelling Framework. In: Proc. of the NSF-EU Workshop on Database and Information Systems Research for Semantic Web and Enterprises (April 2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Motta, J.D.E., Cabral, L., Gaspari, M.: IRS-II: A Framework and Infrastructure for Semantic Web Services. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian Babik
    • 1
  • Ladislav Hluchy
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Institute of InformaticsSlovak Academy of SciencesSlovakia

Personalised recommendations