A MAC Protocol Using Separate Wakeup Slots for Sensor Network

  • Jinsuk Pak
  • Jeongho Son
  • Kijun Han
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3981)


This paper presents a MAC protocol which uses separate wakeup slots for each sensor node in sensor networks. Most MAC protocols proposed for sensor network are inefficient under heavy traffic loads, in particular in high density network topology because of frequent collisions and long sleep latency. In this paper, we suggest a MAC protocol in which each node has a different wakeup schedule in the same duty cycle, and it joins the competition only for its own short wakeup slot when the receiver is ready to receive its data. Simulation results indicate that our scheme can reduce energy consumption and minimize idle listening which increases the power efficiency.


Sensor Network Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Medium Access Control Duty Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., Ganeriwal, S., Srivastava, M.: Optimizing Sensor Networks in the Energy-Latency-Density Design Space. IEEE Transactions on mobile computing 1(1), 70–80 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, P., Qiao, C., Wang, X.: Medium Access Control With A Dynamic Duty Cycle For Sensor Networks. In: WCNC pp. 1534–1539 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng, T., Radhakrishnan, S., Sarangan, V.: PMAC: An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: WMAN 2005, vol. 13(13), p. 237a (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D.: Medium Access Control with Coordinated, Adaptive Sleeping for ireless Sensor Networks. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking 12(3), 493–506 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Dam, T., Langendoen, K.: An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor networks. In: ACM Sensys 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, R., Hou, J.C., Sha, L.: Asynchronous Wakeup For Ad Hoc Networks. In: ACM MobiHoc 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, Y., Ye, W., Heidemann, J.: Schedule and Latency Control in SMAC, Poster, UCLA CENS research review (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D.: An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, New York, pp. 1567–1576 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu, G., Krishnamachari, B., Raghavendra, C.S.: An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: WMAN 2004, vol. 13(13), p. 224a (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramakrishnan, S., Huang, H., Balakrishnan, M., Mullen, J.: Impact of sleep in a wireless sensor MAC protocol. In: VTC 2004-Fall, vol. 7, pp. 4621–4624 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinsuk Pak
    • 1
  • Jeongho Son
    • 1
  • Kijun Han
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguKorea

Personalised recommendations