Dynamic Resource Allocation in Quality of Service Networks
Efficient dynamic resource provisioning algorithms are necessary to the development and automation of Quality of Service (QoS) networks. The main goal of these algorithms is to offer services that satisfy the QoS requirements of individual users while guaranteeing at the same time an efficient utilization of network resources. In this paper we introduce a new service model that provides quantitative per-flow bandwidth guarantees, where users subscribe for a guaranteed rate; moreover, the network periodically individuates unused bandwidth and proposes short-term contracts where extra-bandwidth is allocated and guaranteed exclusively to users who can exploit it to transmit at a rate higher than their subscribed rate. To implement this service model we propose a dynamic provisioning architecture for intra-domain Quality of Service networks. We develop an efficient bandwidth allocation algorithm that takes explicitly into account traffic statistics to increase the users’ benefit and the network revenue simultaneously. We demonstrate through simulation in realistic network scenarios that the proposed dynamic provisioning model is superior to static provisioning in providing resource allocation both in terms of total accepted load and network revenue.
KeywordsAllocation Algorithm Bandwidth Allocation Policy Decision Point Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation Dynamic Resource Allocation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Campbell, A.T., Liao, R.R.-F.: Dynamic Edge Provisioning for Core IP Networks. In: Proc. IEEE/IFIP Int’l Workshop on Quality of Service IWQOS, Pittsburgh, USA (June 2000)Google Scholar
- 4.Ahmed, T., Boutaba, R., Mehaoua, A.: A Measurement-Based Approach for Dynamic QoS Adaptation in DiffServ Network. Journal of Computer Communications, Special issue on End-to-End Quality of Service Differentiation, Elsevier Science (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.de Meer, H., O’Hanlon, P.: Segmented Adaptation of Traffic aggregates. In: Proc. 9th International Workshop on Quality of Service IWQOS, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 6-8, pp. 342–353 (2001)Google Scholar
- 7.Cao, Z., Zegura, E.: Utility Max-Min: An Application-Oriented Bandwidth Allocation Scheme. In: Proc. IEEE Infocom 1999, New York, USA (March 1999)Google Scholar
- 12.Breslau, L., Shenker, S.: Best-Effort versus Reservations: A Simple Comparative Analysis. In: Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, September 1998, pp. 3–16 (1998)Google Scholar
- 14.Schulzrinne, H., Wang, X.: RNAP: A resource negotiation and pricing protocol. In: Int. Workshop Netw. Oper. Syst. Support Digital Audio Video, Basking Ridge, NJ, June 1999, pp. 77–93 (1999)Google Scholar
- 15.J-Sim. Ohio State University, Available at: www.j-sim.org