Advertisement

Negotiating Agent: Concept, Architecture and Communication Model

  • Mukun Cao
  • Yuqiang Feng
  • Yan Li
  • Chunyan Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3930)

Abstract

Traditional research in automated negotiation focuses on negotiation protocol and strategy. This paper studies automated negotiation from a new point, proposes a novel concept, namely negotiating agent, argues its significance in construction of automated negotiation system; designs its architecture, which can support both goal-directed reasoning and reactive response. In order to construct an interaction mechanism among negotiating agents, a communication model is proposed, in which the negotiation language used by agents is defined. Design of the communication model and the language has been attempted in such a way so as to provide general support for a wide variety of commercial negotiation circumstances, and therefore to be particularly suitable for electronic commerce. Finally, the design and expression of the negotiation ontology are discussed.

Keywords

Communication Model Belief Base Negotiation Strategy Negotiation Protocol Agent Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tamma, V., Wooldridge, M., Dickinson, I.: An Ontology-based Approach to Automated Negotiation. In: Padget, J., Shehory, O., Parkes, D.C., Sadeh, N.M., Walsh, W.E. (eds.) AMEC 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2531, pp. 219–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Int. J. of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligent 42(3), 213–261 (1990)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Georgeff, M.P., Ingrand, F.F.: Research on procedural reasoning systems. Final Report, Phase 1, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, Cal (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multi-agent Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Labrou, Y., Finin, T.: A Proposal for a new KQML Specification (1996), Online, http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml/papers
  8. 8.
    FIPA (2000) Specification part 2-agent communication language (2002), Online, http://www.fipa.org/
  9. 9.
    Georgeff, M.P., Ingrand, F.F.: Decision-making in an embedded reasoning system. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1989), Detroit, MI, pp. 972–978. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finin, T., Weber, J., McGuire, J., Shapiro, S., Beck, C.: Specification of the KQML Agent Communication Language (1993), Online, http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml/papers
  11. 11.
    Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P.: Ontology for Agents. IEEE Internet Computing, 81–83 (December 1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong, Y.: KQML ontology (2003), Online, http://cse.seu.edu.cn/people/ysdong/kqml.owl
  13. 13.
    Bartolini, C., Jennings, C.P.N.: A generic software framework for automated network. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lomuscio, A.R., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. Int. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 12(1), 31–56 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aknine, S., Pinson, S., Shakun, M.F.: An extended multi-agent negotiation protocol. International Journal on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 8(1), 5–45 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukun Cao
    • 1
  • Yuqiang Feng
    • 1
  • Yan Li
    • 1
  • Chunyan Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Management Information SystemHarbin Institute of TechnologyHeilongjiangChina
  2. 2.Beijing Institute of Information ControlBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations