Advertisement

Improving Retrieval Performance with the Combination of Thesauri and Automatic Relevance Feedback

  • Mao-Zu Guo
  • Jian-Fu Li
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3930)

Abstract

The ever growing popularity of the Internet as a source of information, coupled with the accompanying growth in the number of documents available through the World Wide Web, is leading to an increasing demand for more efficient and accurate information retrieval tools. One of the fundamental problems in information retrieval is word mismatch. Expanding a user’s query with related words can improve the search performance, but the finding and using of related words is still an open problem. On the basis of previous approaches to query expansion, this paper proposes a new approach to query expansion that combines two popular traditional methods—thesauri and automatic relevance feedback. According to theoretical analysis and experiments, the new approach can effectively improve the web retrieval performance and out-performs the optimized conventional expansion approaches.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Relevance Feedback Related Word Query Expansion Information Retrieval System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kobayashi, M., Takeda, K.: Information on retrieval on the web. ACM Computing Survey 32(2), 328–354 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nekrestyanov, I.S., Panteleeva, N.V.: Text Rrtrieval Systems for The Web. Programming and Computer Software 28(4), 207–225 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furnas: Information Retrieval Using a Singular Value Decomposition Model of Latent Semantic Structure. In: Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New York, pp. 465–480 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mee, C.Y., Yun, L.J.: Optimization of Some Factors Affecting The Performance of Query Expansion. Information Processing and Management 40(6), 891–917 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheng, F., Fan, X., Thomas, G.: A Knowledge-Based Approach to Effective Document Retrieval. Journal of Systems Integration 10(2), 411–436 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buckley, C., Salton, G.: The Effect of Adding Relevance Information in a Relevance Feedback Environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, London, pp. 292–300 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taghva, K., Borsack, J., Nartker, T., Condit, A.: The Role of Manually-Assigned Keywords in Query Expansion. Information Processing and Management 40(3), 441–458 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekmekcioglu: Effectiveness of Query Expansion in Ranked-Output Document Retrieval Systems. Journal of Information Service 18(2), 139–147 (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H.-M.: An Investigation of User Attitudes toward Search Engines as an Information Retrieval Tool. Computers in Human Bebavior 19(2), 751–765 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moldovan, D., Novischi, A.: Word Sense Disambiguation of WordNet Glosses. Computer Speech and Language 18(3), 301–317 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jinxi, X.U., Bruce, W.: Croft: Improving The Effectiveness of Information Retrieval with Local Context Analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 18(1), 79–112 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mao-Zu Guo
    • 1
  • Jian-Fu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations