Abstract
We argue that it is useful to study classes of Multi-Agent System (mas) architectures, corresponding to architectural styles in addition to particular architectures. In this work we focus on a particular abstraction level where mas architectural styles are characterized according to properties, such as, the type of control used (from fully centralized to fully distributed), and the type of coordination used. Different architectural styles support different quality attributes to different extent. When choosing architectural style for a given application domain, we argue that it is important to evaluate the them according to the quality attributes relevant to that application. The architectural style that provides the most appropriate balance between these attributes should then be selected. As a case study we investigate the problem of dynamic and distributed resource allocation and compare six mas architectural styles that can be used to handle this task. We also illustrate the use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, which is a basic approach to select the most suitable alternative from a number of alternatives evaluated with respect to several criteria, for selecting the architectural style that balance the trade-off between the relevant quality attributes in the best way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A.: An Introduction toManagement Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making. SouthWestern College Publishing, Cincinnati Ohio (2000)
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading (1998)
Bodanese, E., Cuthbert, L.: An intelligent channel allocation scheme for mobile networks: An application of agent technology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 322–333. World Scientific Press, Singapore (2001)
Bosch, J.: Design & Use of Software Architectures - Adopting and Evolving a Product Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2000)
Buschmann, F., Jäkel, C., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Stahl, M.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture - A System of Patterns. John Wiley, Chichester (1996)
Chung, L., Cooper, K., Yi, A.: Developing adaptable software architectures using design patterns: an nfr approach. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 25(3), 253–260 (2003)
Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)
Davidsson, P., Johansson, S., Svahnberg, M.: Characterization and evaluation of multiagent system architectural styles. In: Garcia, A., Choren, R., Lucena, C., Giorgini, P., Holvoet, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds.) SELMAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3914, pp. 179–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Himoff, J., Skobelev, P., Wooldridge, M.: Magenta technology: Multi-agent systems for industrial logistics. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, volume Industry Track, pp. 60–66. ACM press, New York (2005)
Johansson, S., Davidsson, P., Kristell, M.: Four architectures for dynamic resource allocation. In: Karmouch, A., Magedanz, T., Delgado, J. (eds.) MATA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2521, pp. 239–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Karlsson, J., Ryan, K.: A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Software 14(5), 67–74 (1997)
Karlsson, J., Wohlin, C., Regnell, B.: An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements. Information and Software Technology 39(14-15), 938–947 (1998)
Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 view model of architecture. IEEE Software, 42–50 (July 1995)
McCall, J.: Quality Factors. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 959–969. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester (1994)
McPhail, J.C., Deugo, D.: Deciding on a pattern. In: Monostori, L., Váncza, J., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2070, pp. 901–910. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York (1980)
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (2001)
Shaw, M., Garlan, D.: Software Architecture - Perspectives on an Emergin Discipline. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1996)
Shepperd, M., Barker, S., Aylett, M.: The analytic hierarchy process and almost dataless prediction. In: Kuster, R.J., Cowderoy, A., Heemstra, F., van Veenendaal, E.P. (eds.) Project Control for Software Quality - Proceedings of ESCOM-SCOPE 1999, Maastricht the Netherlands. Shaker Publishing BV (1999)
Svahnberg, M.: An industrial study on building consensus around software architectures and quality attributes. Journal of Information and Software Technology 46(12), 805–818 (2004)
Weyns, D., Schelfthout, K., Holvoet, T., Lefever, T.: Decentralized control of E’GV transportation systems. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, volume Industry Track, pp. 67–74. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Ygge, F.: Market-Oriented Programming and its Application to Power Load Management. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Davidsson, P., Johansson, S., Svahnberg, M. (2006). Characterization and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Architectural Styles. In: Garcia, A., Choren, R., Lucena, C., Giorgini, P., Holvoet, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds) Software Engineering for Multi-Agent Systems IV. SELMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3914. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11738817_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11738817_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33580-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33583-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)