Skip to main content

Component Based E-Learning System Using Item Analysis

  • Conference paper
Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment (Edutainment 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3942))

Abstract

Recently, the research of E-learning system part applies item analysis method for efficient study. Item analysis method used question analysis for increasing of learners study ability. That is, when compiling the data for local programs, item difficulty, one of item analysis, is used for the Intermediate-Level technology education test. But guessing factor for items in learning results has to be considered to apply the relative item difficulty more precisely. In this paper, I have implemented component based E-learning system which learners are able to select study step by item difficulty. This system was implemented by CBD(Component-Based Development) for efficient development. In this applied result, I have shown efficiency of development in E-learning system by CBD and learning operation in this system by item difficulty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Perrin, K.M., Mayhew, D.: The Reality of Designing and Implementing an Internet based Course. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 3(4) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ballou, D.: Sizing Up Test Scores. Education next (Summer 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beagle, D.: Web-based Learning Environments: Do Libraries Matter? ALA American Library Association 61(4) (July 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Intermediate-Level Technology Education Test, GUIDE to Intermediate-Level Program Evaluation Forms A, B, C, and D, New York State Program Evaluation Test (June 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schagen, I., Bradshaw, J.: Modelling Item Difficulty for Bookmark Standard Setting. In: The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference (September 11-13, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mulqueen, C., Baker, D.P., Dismukes, R.K.: Using Multifacet Rasch analysis to examine the effectiveness of rater training. In: 15th Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rodrigues, G., Rosenblum, D., Uchitel, S.: Using Scenarios to Predict the Reliability of Concurrent Component-Based Software Systems. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehta, N.R., Medvidovic, N., Phadke, S.: Towards a Taxonomy of Software Connectors. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeong, HY. (2006). Component Based E-Learning System Using Item Analysis. In: Pan, Z., Aylett, R., Diener, H., Jin, X., Göbel, S., Li, L. (eds) Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment. Edutainment 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3942. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33423-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33424-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics