Using Olfactive Virtual Environments for Learning Organic Molecules

  • Angèle Tijou
  • Emmanuelle Richard
  • Paul Richard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3942)


A multi-modal virtual reality application that aims to investigate the effect of olfaction on learning, retention, and recall of complex 3D structures such as organic molecules, is presented. Students interact with molecules in either desktop or immersive configuration. In the latter case, visual immersion is achieved through the use of a large rear-projected stereoscopic screen. In both configurations motion parallax is provided using a camera-based head tracking technique. Both desktop and large-scale fan-based devices that allow real-time smell diffusion are used.


Virtual Reality Virtual Environment Interaction Technique Motion Parallax Virtual Reality Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burdea, G., Coiffet, P. (eds.): Virtual Reality Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stanney, K.M. (ed.): Handbook of the Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winn, W.: A conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality. Technical Publication R-93-9. University of Washington, HITL, Seattle, WA (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salzmann, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, R.B., Sprague, D.: Science Space: Lessons for Designing Immersive Virtual Realities. In: Proc. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 89–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Youngblut, C.: Educational Use of Virtual Reality Technology. Tec. Report. Inst. Defense Analyses, US (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C.M., Gil, V.: Virtual water, an application of virtual environments as an education tool for physics and chemistry. In: Cumming, G., et al. (eds.) Advanced Research in Computers and Communication in Education. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Computers in Education, ICCE 1999, Chiba, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 655–658. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fjeld, M., Voegtli, M.: Augmented Chemistry: An Interactive Educational Workbench. In: ISMAR 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauer, C.M., Hastings, W.A., Okamura, A.M.: Virtual Environment for Exploring Atomic Bonding. In: Proc. EuroHaptics 2004, Munich, Germany, vol. 15, pp. 232–239 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sankaranarayanan, G., Weghorst, S., Sanner, M., Gillet, A., Olson, A.: Role of Haptics in Teaching Structural Molecular Biology. In: Proc. 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles, CA, p. 365 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nikolou, E., Mikropoulos, T.A., Katsikis, A.: Virtual Realities in Biology Teaching. In: Bevan, M. (ed.) Proc. Int. Conference Virtual Reality in Education and Training, Loughborough, UK, pp. 59–63 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mikropoulos, T.A., Katsikis, A., Nikolou, E., Tsakalis, P.: Virtual Environments in Biology Teaching. J. Biological Education 37(4), 176–181 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karr, T.L., Brady, R.: Virtual Biology in the CAVE. Trends in Genetics 16, 231–232 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barfield, W., Danas, E.: Comments on the use of olfactory displays for virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 5(1), 109–121 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dinh, H.Q., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F., Chang, S., Kobayashi, A.: Evaluating the Importance of Multi-sensory Input on Memory and the Sense of Presence in Virtual environments. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf. 1999 (VRC 1999), Houston, Texas, pp. 222–228 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Von Békésy, G.: Olfactory analog to directional hearing. J. of Applied Physiology 19, 369–373 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morie, J.F., Iyer, K., Valanejad, K., Sadek, R., Miraglia, D., Milam, D., Williams, J., Luigi, D.-P., Leshin, J.: Sensory Design for Virtual Environments. In: SIGGRAPH 2003, Sketch, San Diego, CA (July 2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richard, P., Chamaret, D., Tijou, A., Richard, E., Ferrier, J.-L.: A Multi-Modal Virtual Environment with Human-Scale Haptic and Olfactory Feedbacks. Submitted to Virtual Reality Journal, Special Issue: Multisensory interaction in virtual environment (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papin, J.-P., Bouallagui, M., Ouali, A., Richard, P., Tijou, A., Poisson, P., Bartoli, W.: DIODE: Smell-diffusion in real and virtual environments. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Virtual Reality (VRIC 2003), Laval, France, pp. 113–117 (May 2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richard, E., Tijou, A., Richard, P.: Multi-Modal Environments for Education: From Illusion To Immersion. In: Submitted to Edutainment 2006, April 16-18. Zhejiang Univ., China (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Köster, E.G.: The Specific Characteristics of the Sense of Smell. In: Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervay, R., Holley, A. (eds.) Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition, ch. 3, pp. 27–43. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schiffman, S.S., Pearce, T.C.: Introduction to olfaction: perception, anatomy, physiology, and molecular biology. In: Pearce, T.C., Schiffman, S.S., Nagle, H.T., Gardner, J.W. (eds.) Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose Technology. Wiley-VCH, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laska, M., Teubner, P.: Olfactory discrimination Ability of Human subjects for Ten Pairs of Enantiomers. Chemical Senses 24, 161–170 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warm, J.S., Dember, W.N., Parasuraman, R.: Effects on Fragrance on Vigilance, Performance and Stress. Perfumer and Flavorist 15, 15–18 (1990)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baron, R.A.: Environmentally Induced Positive Effects: Its Impact on Self-efficacy, Task Performance, Negotiation and Conflict. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20, 368–384 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Degel, J., Köster, E.G.: Odors:Implicit Memory and Performance Effects. Chemical Senses 26, 267–280 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilson, D.A., Stevenson, R.J.: Olfactory perceptual learning: the critical role of memory in odor discrimination. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 27, 307–328 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herz, R.S., Eich, E.: Commentary and Envoi. In: Schab, F.R., Crowder, R.G. (eds.) Memory for Odors, pp. 159–175. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1995)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herz, R.S.: Are odors the best cues to memory? A cross-modal comparison of associative memory stimuli. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855, 670–674 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Herz, R.S., Engen, T.: Odor Memory: Review and Analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3, 300–313 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Annett, J.M.: Olfactory memory: A case study in cognitive psychology. J. Psychology 130(3), 309–319 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Danthiir, V., Roberts, R.D., Pallier, G., Stankov, L.: What the nose knows: Olfaction and cognitive abilities. Intelligence 29(4), 337–361 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Youngblut, C., Johnson, R.E., Nash, S.H., Weinclaw, R.A., Will, C.A.: Review of Virtual Environment Interface Technology. IDA Paper P-3186, ch. 8, pp. 209–216 (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kaye, J.N.: Symbolic Olfactory Display. Master’s Thesis, MIT Media Lab (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wood, J.T., Eddy, R.M.: Filtrates and Residues: Olfactory Titration. J. Chem. Educ. 73(3), 257–258 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heilig, M.L.: US Patent 3,050,870 Sensorama Stimulator (August 28, 1962)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Osmooze homepage,
  37. 37.
    AromaJet homepage,
  38. 38.
    TriSenx homepage,
  39. 39.
    ScentAir Technologies homepage,
  40. 40.
    Ruetz Technologies homepage,
  41. 41.
    Yanagida, Y., Kawato, S., Nom, a.H., Tomono, A., Tetsutani, N.: Projection-Based Olfactory Display with Nose Tracking. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf. 2004 (VRC 2004), Chicago, pp. 43–50 (March 2004)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mochizuki, A., Amada, T., Sawa, S., Takeda, T., Motoyashiki, S., Kohyama, K., Imura, M., Chihara, K.: An Olfactory Display Device Linked with Human Gesture. In: Proc. SCI 2004, Kyoto, Japan, vol. 48(6004), pp. 531–532 (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Washburn, D.A., Jones, L.M.: Could Olfactory Displays Improve Data Visualization? Computing in Science and Engineering, 80–83 (November-December 2004)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Digital Tech Frontier LLC homepage (2000),
  45. 45.
    ChangHoon, P., Heedong, K., Ig-Jae, K., Sang Chul, A., Yong-Moo, K., Hyoung-Gon, K.: The Making of Kyongju VR Theatre. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf. 2002 (VRC 2002), pp. 269–273 (2002)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cater, J.P.: Approximating the senses. Smell/Taste: Odors in Virtual Reality. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio, vol. 2, p. 1781 (1994)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Washburn, D.A., Jones, L.M., Satya, R.V., Bowers, C.A., Cortes, A.: Olfactory Use in Virtual Environment Training. Modeling and Simulation Magazine 2(3) (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Keller, P.E., Kouzes, R.T., Kangas, L.J., Hashem, S.: Transmission of Olfactory Information for Telemedicine. In: Morgan, K., Satava, R.M., Sieburg, H.B., Matteus, R., Christensen, J.P. (eds.) Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, pp. 168–172. IOS Press and Ohmsha, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rizzo, A.: Development of a Virtual Reality Therapy Application for Iraq War Veterans with PTSD, Virtual Reality. Associated Technologies and Rehabilitation, Three-day Symposium, University of Haifa, Israel, March 7-9 (2005)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rizzo, A., Jounghyun, A.: SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14(2), 119–146 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nice-smelling Interactive Multimedia Alphabet. project homepage,
  52. 52.
  53. 53.
    AnthroTronix homepage,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angèle Tijou
    • 1
  • Emmanuelle Richard
    • 1
  • Paul Richard
    • 1
  1. 1.LISA, EA 4014Université d’AngersAngersFrance

Personalised recommendations