Advertisement

Can a Workspace Help to Overcome the Query Formulation Problem in Image Retrieval?

  • Jana Urban
  • Joemon M. Jose
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3936)

Abstract

We have proposed a novel image retrieval system that incorporates a workspace where users can organise their search results. A task-oriented and user-centred experiment has been devised involving design professionals and several types of realistic search tasks. We study the workspace’s effect on two aspects: task conceptualisation and query formulation. A traditional relevance feedback system serves as baseline. The results of this study show that the workspace is more useful with respect to both of the above aspects. The proposed approach leads to a more effective and enjoyable search experience.

Keywords

Image Retrieval Search Task Relevance Feedback Relevant Image Query Formulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Urban, J., Jose, J.M.: EGO: A personalised multimedia management and retrieval tool. In: International Journal of Intelligent Systems (IJIS), Special Issue on ‘Intelligent Multimedia Retrieval’ (2005) (to appear)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hendry, D.G., Harper, D.J.: An informal information-seeking environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, 1036–1048 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Urban, J., Jose, J.M.: An explorative study of interface support for image searching. In: Detyniecki, M., Jose, J.M., Nürnberger, A., van Rijsbergen, C.J.K. (eds.) AMR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3877, pp. 207–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rui, Y., Huang, T.S.: Optimizing learning in image retrieval. In: IEEE Proc. of Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2000), pp. 236–245. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkley’s Digital Library Project (2005), http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/photos/corel/
  6. 6.
    Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction toModern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, Tokio (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urban, J., Jose, J.M.: Evidence combination for multi-point query learning in content-based image retrieval. In: Proc. of the IEEE Sixth Int. Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering (ISMSE 2004), pp. 583–586 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, X.S., Huang, T.: Relevance feedback in image retrieval: A comprehensive review. ACM Multimedia Systems Journal 8, 536–544 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jose, J.M., Furner, J., Harper, D.J.: Spatial querying for image retrieval: A user-oriented evaluation. In: Proc. of the Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1998), pp. 232–240. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ingwersen, P.: Information Retrieval Interaction. Taylor Graham, London (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beaulieu, M., Jones, S.: Interactive searching and interface issues in the Okapi best match probabilistic retrieval system. Interacting with Computers 10, 237–248 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Urban
    • 1
  • Joemon M. Jose
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations