Advertisement

An Artificial Maieutic Approach for Eliciting Experts’ Knowledge in Multi-agent Simulations

  • François Sempé
  • Minh Nguyen-Duc
  • Stanislas Boissau
  • Alain Boucher
  • Alexis Drogoul
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3891)

Abstract

Models of human behaviours used in multi-agent simulations are limited by the ability of introspection of the social actors: some of their knowledge (reflexes, habits, non-formalized expertise) cannot be extracted through interviews. The use of computer-mediated role playing games put these actors into a situated stance where the recording of their "live" behaviours is possible. But cognitive processes and motivations still have to be interpreted.

In this paper, we propose an artificial maieutic approach to extract such pieces of knowledge, by helping the actors to better understand, and sometimes formulate, their own behaviours. The actors are playing their own roles in an agent-mediated simulation and interact with agents that question their behaviours. The actor’s reactions and understanding are stimulated by these interactions, and this situation allows in many cases to reveal hidden knowledge. We present here the first results using two complementary works in social simulations, one in the domain of air traffic control and one in the domain of common-pool resources sharing.

Keywords

Multiagent System Artificial Agent Flow Manager Interface Agent Simulation Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    d’Aquino, P., Barreteau, O., Etienne, M., Boissau, S., Aubert, S., Bousquet, F., Le Page, C., Dare, W.: The Role Playing Games in an ABM participatory modeling process: outcomes from five different experiments carried out in the last five years., in Comm. to IEMSS, Lugano, June 24-27 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F.: Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boisseau, S.: Co-evolution of a research question and methodological development: an exemple of companion modeling in northern Vietnam. In: F. Bousquet & G. Trebuil (eds.) Companion modeling and multi-agent systems for integrated natural resources management in Asia (in Press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Candea, A., Hu, H., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., Piaggo, M.: Coordination in multi-agent RoboCup teams. Robotic and Autonomous Systems 36, 67–86 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drogoul, A., Corbara, B., Fresneau, D.: MANTA: New experimental results on the emergence of (artificial) ant societies. In: Castelfranchi, C., Müller, J.P. (eds.) From reaction to cognition, lecture notes in AI n° 957, pp. 13–27. Springer, Berlin (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drogoul, A., Meurisse, T., Vanbergue, D.: Multi-Agent based simulations: Where are the agents? In: Sichman, J.S., Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2581, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guyot, P., Drogoul, A.: Designing multi-agent based participatory simulations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Agent Based Simulations, Lisbon (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hill, R.W., Chen, J., Gratch, J., Rosenbloom, P., Tambe, M.: Intelligent Agents for the Synthetic Battlefield: A Company of Rotary-Wing Aircraft. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, pp. 1006–1012 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishida, T.: Q: A Scenario Description Language for Interactive Agents. In: IEEE Computer (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nair, R., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Role allocation and reallocation in multi-agent teams: Towards a practical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Joint conf. on agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS 2003) (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen-Duc, M., Duong, V., Drogoul, A.: Agent-based modeling and experimentation for Real-time Collaborative Decision-Making in Air Traffic Management. In: Proceedings of the 24th Congress of the Int. Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS 2004), Yokohama (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ostrom, E.: Coping with the tragedy of commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2, 493–535 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Said, L.B., Bouron, T., Drogoul, A.: Agent-based interaction analysis of consumer behavior. In: Alonso, E., Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D. (eds.) AAMAS 2000 and AAMAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2636, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Sempé
    • 1
  • Minh Nguyen-Duc
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stanislas Boissau
    • 3
  • Alain Boucher
    • 1
  • Alexis Drogoul
    • 4
  1. 1.Institut de la Francophonie pour l’Informatique (IFI)HanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Informatique de l’université de Paris 6 (LIP6)ParisFrance
  3. 3.Netherlands, and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences SocialesWageningen UniversityParisFrance
  4. 4.Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)BondyFrance

Personalised recommendations