Neural Nets pp 261-271 | Cite as

Supporting Collaborative Knowledge Work: A Methodology for Developing ICT Tools for Biomedical Research

  • Henry Linger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3931)


The nature of knowledge work not only addresses the productive aspects of an activity but also the intellective work that underpins production. Support for knowledge work requires tools for both types of tasks in order to integrate these aspects and to make the cognitive tasks visible. Biomedical research is concerned with the structure and behaviour of phenomena and requires tools that support the exploration of both aspects of the phenomena. This paper presents a method for developing computer-based models that allow such investigations. The method is based on a linguistic paradigm that assumes the models express the common language that represents the phenomena and is constructed collaboratively between a biomedical researcher and a computer scientist.


Domain Expert Common Language Knowledge Work Representation Dimension Subject Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burstein, F., Linger, H.: Supporting post-fordist work practices: A knowledge management framework for dynamic intelligent decision support. Journal of IT&P special issue on KM 16, 289–305 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iivari, J., Linger, H.: The characteristics of knowledge work: A theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2000, Long Beach California (August 2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iivari, J., Linger, H.: Knowledge work as collaborative work: A situated activity theory view. In: Collaborative Technology mini-track, Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Science, HICSS 32 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aarons, J., Burstein, F., Linger, H.: What is the task? – applying the task-based km framework to weather forecasting. In: Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Knowledge Management and Intelligent Decision Support, ACKMIDS (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linger, H.: Towards a linguistic paradigm for information systems development. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Systems Development, ISD 1996, Sopot, Poland (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linger, H., Komleva, N., Newnham, J.: Collaborative development of support tools for biological research. In: Blumenthal, B., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. (eds.) EWHCI 1994, vol. 876. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charlesworth, M., Farrall, L., Stokes, T., Turnbull, D.: Life amongst the scientists: an anthropological study of an Australian scientific community. Oxford University Press, Melbourne (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turnbull, D., Stokes, T.: Manipulable systems and laboratory strategies in a biomedical institute. In: Grand, H.L. (ed.) Experimental Inquiries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latour, B.: Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6, 1–40 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Celada, F., Seiden, P.: A computer model of cellular interactions in the immune system. Immunology Today 13, 56–62 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mussio, P., Pietrogrande, M., Protti, M.: Simulation of hepatological models: A study in visual interactive exploration of scientific problems. Journal of Visual languages and Computing 2, 75–95 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lyytinen, K.: Different perspectives on information systems: Problems and solutions. ACM Computing Surveys 19, 5–46 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wootton, A.: Dilemmas of Discourse. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London (1975)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tondl, L.: Problems of Semantics. Reitel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1981)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perelson, A., Weisbuch, G.: Theoretical and experimental insights into immunology. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Theoretical Immunology Paris Nato ASI Series, Berlin. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Segal, L.A., Perelson, A., Hyman, J., Klaus, S.: Rash theory. In: Perelson & Weisbuch 1991 (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agur, Z., Mazor, G., Melijson, I.: Mimicking the strategy of the immune system: Insights gained from mathematics. In: Perelson & Weisbuch 1991 (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McLean, A.R.: T memory cells in a model of t-cell memory. In: Perelson & Weisbuch 1991 (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mussio, P., Finadri, M., Gentini, P., Colombo, F.: A bootstrap approach to visual user interface design and development. The Visual Computer 8, 75–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mussio, P., Pietrogrande, M., Brambilla, F., Caserta, C., Cefalo, A., Randetti, M., Bottoni, P., Dioguardi, N.: Modelling of biological and medical systems: a systemic strategy. BioSystems 26, 31–43 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mussio, P.: e-Documents as tools for the humanized management of community knowledge. In: Linger, et al. (eds.) Constructing the Infrastructure for the Knowledge Economy: Methods and Tools; Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beer, S.: The Brain of Firm. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eaves, D.: Professionals, Professions and the Curiosity of Clinical Practice. Working Paper 20/93, Department of Information Systems, Monash University (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morik, K.: Sloppy Modelling. In: Morik, K. (ed.) Knowledge Representation and Organisation in Machine Learning, Berlin. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klein, H.K., Hirschheim, R.A.: A Comparative Framework of Data Modelling Paradigms and Approaches. The Computer Journal 30, 8–15 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Linger
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Management Research Program, Faculty of Information TechnologyMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations