Hybrid Modelling and Control of the Common Rail Injection System

  • Andrea Balluchi
  • Antonio Bicchi
  • Emanuele Mazzi
  • Alberto L. Sangiovanni Vincentelli
  • Gabriele Serra
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3927)

Abstract

We present an industrial case study in automotive control of significant complexity: the new common rail fuel injection system for Diesel engines, currently under production by Magneti Marelli Powertrain. In this system, a flow–rate valve, introduced before the High Pressure (HP) pump, regulates the fuel flow that supplies the common rail according to the engine operating point. The standard approach followed in automotive control is to use a mean–value model for the plant and to develop a controller based on this model. In this particular case, this approach does not provide a satisfactory solution as the discrete–continuous interactions in the fuel injection system, due to the slow time–varying frequency of the HP pump cycles and the fast sampling frequency of sensing and actuation, play a fundamental role. We present a design approach based on a hybrid model of the Magneti Marelli Powertrain common–rail fuel–injection system for four-cylinder multi–jet engines and a hybrid approach to the design of a rail pressure controller. The hybrid controller is compared with a classical mean–value based approach to automotive control design whereby the quality of the hybrid solution is demonstrated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balluchi, A., Benedetto, M.D.D., Pinello, C., Rossi, C., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L.: Hybrid control in automotive applications: the cut-off control. Automatica: a Journal of IFAC 35, 519–535 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baotic, M., Vasak, M., Morari, M., Peric, N.: Hybrid theory based optimal control of electronic throttle. In: Proc. of the IEEE American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, ACC, pp. 5209–5214 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balluchi, A., Benvenuti, L., Lemma, C., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., Serra, G.: Actual engaged gear identification: a hybrid observer approach. In: 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, CZ, IFAC (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mobus, R., Baotic, M., Morari, M.: Multi-object adaptive cruise control. Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control 2623, 359–374 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Millo, F.: Il sistema common rail. Technical report, Dipartimento di Energetica, Politecnico di Torino (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henzingerz, T.A.: The theory of hybrid automata. Technical report, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California (Berkeley)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosch: Injection Systems for Diesel Engines. Technical Customer Documents (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knapp, R.: Cavitation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rath, G.: Smith’s method for dead time control. Technical report (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirkin, L.: Control of dead-time systems, K.U.Leuven - Belgium, Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glasson, D.: Development and applications of multirate digital control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 3, 2–8 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vaidyanathan, P.: Multirate digital filters, filter banks, polyphase networks and applications: a tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE 78, 56–92 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Balluchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio Bicchi
    • 2
  • Emanuele Mazzi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alberto L. Sangiovanni Vincentelli
    • 1
    • 3
  • Gabriele Serra
    • 4
  1. 1.PARADESRomaItaly
  2. 2.Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Enrico Piaggio”Università di PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Dept. of EECS.University of California at BerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Magneti Marelli PowertrainBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations