Advertisement

Machine Learning Techniques and Chi-Square Feature Selection for Cancer Classification Using SAGE Gene Expression Profiles

  • Xin Jin
  • Anbang Xu
  • Rongfang Bie
  • Ping Guo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3916)

Abstract

Recently developed Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) technology enables us to simultaneously quantify the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes in a population of cells. SAGE is better than Microarray in that SAGE can monitor both known and unknown genes while Microarray can only measure known genes. SAGE gene expression profiling based cancer classification is a better choice since cancers may be due to some unknown genes. Whereas a wide range of methods has been applied to traditional Microarray based cancer classification, relatively few studies have been done on SAGE based cancer classification. In our study we evaluate popular machine learning methods (SVM, Naive Bayes, Nearest Neighbor, C4.5 and RIPPER) for classifying cancers based on SAGE data. In order to deal with the high dimensional problem, we propose to use Chi-square for tag/gene selection. Both binary classification and multicategory classification are investigated. The experiments are based on two human SAGE datasets: brain and breast. The results show that SVM and Naive Bayes are the top-performing SAGE classifiers and that Chi-square based gene selection can improve the performance of all the five classifiers investigated.

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Near Neighbor Machine Learn Technique Sequential Minimal Optimization Maximum Margin Hyperplane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Li, C., Haiyan, H., Seth, B., Jun, L., Connie, C., Wing, W.: Clustering Analysis of SAGE Data Using a Poisson Approach. Genome Biology 5, 51 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ng, R.T., Sander, J., Sleumer, M.C.: Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of SAGE Data for Cancer Profiling. BIOKDD, 65–72 (2001) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Velculescu, V.E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B., Kinzler, K.W.: Serial Analysis of Gene Expression. Science 270, 484–487 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckhaults, P., et al.: Identifying Tumor Origin Using a Gene Expression-based Classification Map. Cancer Res. 63, 4144–4149 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porter, D., et al.: A Neural Survival Factor is a Candidate Oncogene in Breast Cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (100), 10931–10936 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., Vapnik, V.: Gene Selection for Cancer Classification Using Support Vector Machines. Machine Learning 46(1/3), 389–422 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Statnikov, A., et al.: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multicategory Classification Methods for Microarray Gene Expression Cancer Diagnosis. Bioinformatics Advance Access (September 16, 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golub, T., et al.: Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring. Science 286 (October 15, 1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector Networks. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sander, J., Ng, R.T., Sleumer, M.C., Saint Yuen, M., Jones, S.J.: A Methodology for Analyzing SAGE Libraries for Cancer Profiling. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 23(1), 35–60 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, W.W.: Fast Effective Rule Induction. Machine Learning. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference (ML 1995) (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Schneider, K.-M.: A Comparison of Event Models for Naive Bayes Anti-Spam E-Mail Filtering. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 307–314 (April 2003) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Statnikov, A., Aliferis, C.F., Tsamardinos, I., Hardin, D.P., Levy, S.: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multicategory Classification Methods for Microarray Gene Expression Cancer Diagnosis. Bioinformatics (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Androutsopoulos, I., et al.: Learning to Filter Spam E-mail: A Comparison of a Naive Bayesian and a Memory-based Approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Learning and Textual Information Access, pp. 1–13 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    John, G.H., Langley, P.: Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breiman, L.: Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 24(2), 123–140 (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data Mining –Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementation. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quinlan, R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aha, D., Kibler, D.: Instance-based Learning Algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37–66 (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keerthi, S.S., Shevade, S.K., Bhattacharyya, C., Murthy, K.R.K.: Improvements to Platt’s SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design. Neural Computation 13(3), 637–649 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, L., Zhu, J., Tianshun, Y.: An Evaluation of Statistical Spam Filtering Techniques. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process 3(4), 243–269 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Jin
    • 1
  • Anbang Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rongfang Bie
    • 1
  • Ping Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Information Science and TechnologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.Image Processing & Pattern Recognition LaboratoryBeijing Normal UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations