Nomadic Wireless Sensor Networks for Autonomic Pervasive Environments

  • Iacopo Carreras
  • Antonio Francescon
  • Enrico Gregori
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3854)


Pervasive computing is one of the most promising research directions for the next future. More and more interest is devoted to the definition of protocols and paradigms for such challenging scenarios. It is envisioned that almost every object surrounding us will be accessible via some electronic device and will become, to some extent, a node of the communication super-structure. This, of course, will entail completely new problems to be addressed, since it will not be possible to manage a network composed by billions of nodes with traditional Internet protocols.

In order to overcome the aforementioned problems, we propose a novel communication paradigm that, despite its simplicity, provides a viable solution to the new all embracing pervasive environments, exploiting the implicit heterogeneity of the network nodes and the time/space dependence of the information circulating in the network. This article presents the approach and evaluates it through simulations in a real application scenario: a parking lot finding system.


Sensor Node Medium Access Control Mobile User Sink Node User Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kahn, J.M., Katz, R.H., Pister, K.S.J.: Next century challenges: Mobile networking for “smart dust”. In: Proc. of ACM MobiCom, Seattle, pp. 271–278 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3(3), 3–11 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carreras, I., Chlamtac, I., Woesner, H., Zhang, H.: Nomadic sensor networks. In: Proc. of EWSN, pp. 166–176. Springer, Istanbul (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, I.S.S., Tepe, K., Raychaudhuri, D.: Routing protocols for self-organizing hierarchical ad-hoc wireless networks. In: Proc. of IEEE Sarnoff 2003 Symposium, pp. 65–68 (March 2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shah, S.J.R.C., Roy, S., Jian, S., Brunette, W.: Data mules: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. In: Proc. of the IEEE SNPA, pp. 30–41 (May 2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tong, L., Zhao, Q., Adireddy, S.: Sensor networks with mobile agents. In: MILCOM 2003 - IEEE Military Communications Conference, pp. 688–693 (October 2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fall, K.: A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 2003 (August 2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks 38, 393–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system, [Online] Available:
  10. 10.
    Carreras, I.: Nomadic wireless sensor network: a parking lot finding system example. CREATE-NET, Tech. Rep. 3 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perkins, C.E., Royer, E.M.: Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: WMCSA 1999: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications, p. 90. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon, J., Liu, M., Noble, B.: Sound mobility models. In: Proc. of ACM MobiCom, San Diego, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. (August 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Supplement to 802.11-1999,Wireless LAN MAC and PHY specifications: Higher Speed Physical Layer (PHY) extension in the 2.4 GHz band, IEEE Std. (September 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iacopo Carreras
    • 1
  • Antonio Francescon
    • 1
  • Enrico Gregori
    • 2
  1. 1.CREATE-NETTrentoItaly
  2. 2.CNR-IITPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations