Skip to main content

Cognitive Agents for Sense and Respond Logistics

  • Conference paper
Defence Applications of Multi-Agent Systems (DAMAS 2005)

Abstract

We present a novel cognitive agent architecture and demonstrate its effectiveness in the Sense and Respond Logistics (SRL) domain. SRL transforms the static, hierarchical architectures of traditional military models into re-configurable networks designed to encourage coordination among small peer units. Multi-agent systems are ideal for SRL because they can provide valuable automation and decision support from low-level control to high-level information synchronization. In particular, agents can be aware of and adapt to changes in the environment that may affect control and decision making. Our architecture, the Engine for Composable Logical Agents with Intuitive Reorganization (ECLAIR) is a framework for enabling rapid development of coherent agent systems that adapt to their environment once deployed. ECLAIR is based on cognitive theories for motivation and adaptation, including Piaget’s Assimilation and Accommodation [21] and Damasio’s Somatic Marker Hypothesis [6]. To demonstrate our preliminary work, we implemented a simple simulation environment where our agents handle the ordering and delivery of supplies among operational and supply units in several scenarios requiring adaptation of default behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C.: An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review 111(4), 1036–1060 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buczak, A.L., Cooper, D.G., Hofmann, M.O.: Evolutionary platform for agent learning. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, New York, vol. 14, pp. 157–164. ASME Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buczak, A.L., Greene, K., Cooper, D.G., Czajkowski, M., Hofmann, M.O.: A cognitive agent architecture optimized for adaptivity. In: Submission to Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering, ANNIE 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, D.G.: Context based shared understanding for situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the MSS National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion, 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czajkowski, M., Buczak, A.L., Hofmann, M.O.: Dynamic agent composition from semantic web services. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 27–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Damasio, A.R.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. G.P. Putnam, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Decker, K.S., Sycara, K.: Intelligent adaptive information agents. In: Imam, I. (ed.) Working Notes of the AAAI 1996 Workshop on Intelligent Adaptive Agents, Portland, OR (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Defense and the National Interest. Fourth Generation Warfare, http://www.d-n-i.net/second_level/fourth_generation_warefare.htm

  9. Franke, J., Satterfield, B., Jameson, S.: Information sharing in teams of selfaware entities. In: Proceedings of the The Second International Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems NRL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerken, P., Jameson, S., Sidharta, B., Barton, J.: Improving army aviation situational awareness with agent-based data discovery. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haynes, T., Wainwright, R., Sen, S.: Evolving cooperation strategies. In: Lesser, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi–Agent Systems, San Francisco, CA. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helsinger, A., Thome, M., Wright, T.: Cougaar: a scalable, distributed multiagent architecture. In: Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 2, pp. 1910–1917. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ioerger, T.R., Volz, R.A., Yen, J.: Modeling cooperative, reactive behaviors on the battlefield using intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the The Ninth Conference on Computer Generated Forces (9th CGF), pp. 13–23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, R.M., Laird, J.E., Nielsen, P.E., Coulter, K.J., Kenny, P., Koss, F.V.: Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Magazine 20(1), 27–41 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., Moore, A.W.: Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4, 237–285 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis, R.L.: Coginitive theory, soar. Tech. rep., Ohio State University, Department of Computer Science (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Littman, M.L.: Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Machine Learning (ML 1994), New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 157–163. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories. Cooperative Agents for Specific Tasks (CAST), http://www.atl.lmco.com/overview/programs/IS/CAST.html

  20. Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories, http://www.atl.lmco.com/overview/library.html

  21. Miller, P.H.: Theories of Development Psychology. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nason, S., Laird, J.E.: Soar-rl: Integrating reinforcement learning with soar. Tech. rep., University of Michigan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Office of Force Transformation, United States Department of Defense. Operational Sense and Respond Logistics: Coevolution of an Adaptive Enterprise Capability (2004); Concept document in progress

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon, S.J.: The art of military logistics. Communications of the ACM 44(6), 62–66 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutton, R.S.: Reinforcement learning: Past, present and future. In: McKay, B., Yao, X., Newton, C.S., Kim, J.-H., Furuhashi, T. (eds.) SEAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1585, pp. 195–197. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wood, R.J.: Information engineering; the foundation of information warfare. Tech. rep., Air War College, Air University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greene, K., Cooper, D.G., Buczak, A.L., Czajkowski, M., Vagle, J.L., Hofmann, M.O. (2006). Cognitive Agents for Sense and Respond Logistics. In: Thompson, S.G., Ghanea-Hercock, R. (eds) Defence Applications of Multi-Agent Systems. DAMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11683704_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11683704_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32832-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32835-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics