Transforming Heterogeneous Messages Automatically in Web Service Composition

  • Wenjun Yang
  • Juanzi Li
  • Kehong Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3841)


When composing web services, establishing data flow is one of the most important steps. However, still lack of solution is proposed for the fundamental problem in this step about how to link two services with heterogeneous message types. It results in that many an available service candidate has to be abandoned in current web service composition systems because the types of their inputs are not compatible with that of request messages. This paper presents a new solution for linking heterogeneous messages automatically when composing web services. It converts request messages to the format of current service’s input. As the transforming operation is deployed as the third-party web service, this solution can be integrated into current composition systems seamlessly. Available information in message schema is fully utilized for automated message schema matching and XSLT scripts used to convert data are auto-generated according to the message schema matching rules. This solution has been applied in SEWSIP, a prototype of semantic-based web service composition system, and evaluation of related experiments on it shows well results.


Request Message Schema Match Target Schema Message Type Match Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Medjahed, B.: Semantic Web Enabled Composition of Web Services [PhD Dissertation]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia USA (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sirin, E., Hendler, J., Parsia, B.: Semi-automatic Composition of Web Services using Semantic Descriptions. In: Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure workshop in conjunction with ICEIS 2003 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sivashanmugam, K., Miller, J., Sheth, A., Verma, K.: Framework for Semantic Web Process Composition. Technical Report 03-008, LSDIS Lab, Computer Science Dept., UGA,
  4. 4.
    Martin, D., Ankolekar, A., Burstein, M., et al.: OWL-S 1.1,
  5. 5.
    Andrews, T., Curbera, F., Goland, H., et al.: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (V1.1),
  6. 6.
    Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P., Chen, K., et al.: Corpus based schema matching. In: Proc. of the IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWeb 2003) (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the World-Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002), pp. 662–673. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Yang, W.J., Li, J.Z., Wang, K.H.: Interactive Service Composition in SEWSIP. In: Accept to IEEE International Workshop on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE 2005) (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenjun Yang
    • 1
  • Juanzi Li
    • 1
  • Kehong Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations