Skip to main content

Multi-labeled Graph Matching – An algorithm Model for Schema Matching

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computer Science – ASIAN 2005. Data Management on the Web (ASIAN 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3818))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Schema matching is the task of finding semantic correspondences between elements of two schemas, which plays a key role in many database applications. In this paper, we treat the schema matching problem as a combinatorial problem. First, we propose an internal schema model, i.e., the multi-labeled graph, and transform schemas into multi-labeled graphs. Secondly, we discuss a generic graph similarity measure, and propose an optimization function based on multi-labeled graph similarity. Then, we cast schema matching problem into a multi-labeled graph matching problem, which is a classic combinational problem. Finally, we implement a greedy algorithm to find the feasible matching results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berlin, J., Motro, A.: Autoplex: Automated discovery of content for virtual databases. In: Batini, C., Giunchiglia, F., Giorgini, P., Mecella, M. (eds.) CoopIS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2172, pp. 108–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouquet, P., Magnini, B., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: A SAT-based algorithm for context matching. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 2003. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 2680, pp. 66–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Champin, P.-A., Solnon, C.: Measuring the similarity of labeled graphs. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 2689, pp. 80–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks. In: IJCAI 2003, pp. 3–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Do, H.H., Rahm, E.: COMA - A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: VLDB 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Do, H.-H., Melnik, S., Rahm, E.: Comparison of schema matching evaluations. In: Chaudhri, A.B., Jeckle, M., Rahm, E., Unland, R. (eds.) NODe-WS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2593, pp. 221–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Doan, A., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to Match the Schemas of Data Sources: A Multistrategy Approach. In: Machine Learning, vol. 50, pp. 279–301. Kluwer Academic Publishers Manufactured in The Netherlands, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: An algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E.: Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. In: 27th VLDB Conference

    Google Scholar 

  10. Melnik, S.: Generic Model Management. LNCS, vol. 2967. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm. In: ICDE 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, R.J., Haas, L.M., Hernández, M.A.: Clio: Schema Mapping as Query Discovery. In: Proc. VLDB 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Patwardhan, S.: WordNet:Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: On matching schemas automatically. Microsoft Research, Redmon, WA. Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-17 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10, 334–350 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorlin, S., Solnon, C.: Reactive Tabu Search for Measuring Graph Similarity. In: Brun, L., Vento, M. (eds.) GbRPR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3434, pp. 172–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Z., Che, H.y., Shi, P.-f., Sun, Y., Gu, J.: An algebraic framework for schema matching. In: Fan, W., Wu, Z., Yang, J. (eds.) WAIM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3739, pp. 694–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Z., Che, H., Shi, P., Sun, Y., Gu, J. (2005). Multi-labeled Graph Matching – An algorithm Model for Schema Matching. In: Grumbach, S., Sui, L., Vianu, V. (eds) Advances in Computer Science – ASIAN 2005. Data Management on the Web. ASIAN 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3818. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11596370_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11596370_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30767-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32249-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics