Skip to main content
Book cover

Socionics pp 15–35Cite as

From “Clean” Mechanisms to “Dirty” Models: Methodological Perspectives of an Up-Scaling of Actor Constellations

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3413))

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative directions of an up-scaling of sociological and socionic models are discussed. In sociology, problems of up-scaling result from the fact that explanations of structural dynamics do not work with laws but with mechanisms. In contrast to scientific laws or simple correlations, a mechanism is a step-by-step analytical description of the social dynamics which bring about the respective structural effect. If models are up-scaled, the relations between their various independent and dependent variables become more and more ”fuzzy” and a tension can be identified between ”clean” mechanisms and ”dirty” models. Although sociological and socionic models are always constructed for specific cases, with all implications of ”dirtiness”, it will be argued that ”clean” mechanisms are not only helpful but indispensable: The ”dirtier” the models become with up-scaling, the ”cleaner” must be the mechanisms used in modelling to support scientific generalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hirsch, P., Michaels, S., Friedman, R.: “dirty hands” versus ”clean models”: Is sociology in danger of being seduced by economics? American Sociological Review, pp. 317–336 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elster, J.: Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scharpf, F.W.: Games Real Actors Play. In: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Westview, Boulder,CO (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.): Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedström, P.: Mechanisms, Models, and the Micro-to-Macro Link. Working Papers on Social Mechanisms. Stockholm University, Department of Sociology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boudon, R.: Theories of Social Change. A Critical Appraisal. Polity Press, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esser, H.: Soziologie —Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln, Campus, Frankfurt/M (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman, J.: Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. Free Press, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Esser, H.: Soziologie —Allgemeine Grundlagen. Campus, Frankfurt/M (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons, T.: The Structure of Social Action. Free Press, New York (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dittrich, P., Kron, T.: Complex Reflexive Agents asModels of Social Actors. In: Proceedings of the SICE Workshop on Artificial Society/Organization/Economy, Tokyo, Japan. Meeting of Systems Engineering, Gkajutsu Sougou Center, vol. 25, pp. 79–88 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dittrich, P., Kron, T., Banzhaf, W.: On the Scalability of Social Order.Modelling the Problem of Double and Multi Contigency Following Luhmann. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6 (2003), http://jass.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/1/3.html

  14. Kron, T., Lasarczyk, C., Schimank, U.: Doppelte Kontingenz und die Bedeutung von Netzwerken für Kommunkationssysteme. Ergebnisse einer Simulationsstudie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 374–395 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirsch, W.: Einführung in die Theorie der Entscheidungsprozesse. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ashby, W.R.: Einführung in die Kybernetik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schimank, U.: Theoretische Modelle sozialer Strukturdynamiken: Ein Gefüge von Generalisierungsniveaus. In: Mayntz, R. (ed.) Akteure, Mechanismen und Modelle, pp. 151–178. Campus, Frankfurt/M (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schimank, U.: Handeln und Strukturen. Leske + Budrich, Opladen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindblom, C.E.: The Intelligence of Democracy. In: Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. Free Press, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luhmann, N.: Warum AGIL? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, pp. 127–139 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simmel, G.: Soziologie. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scharpf, F.W.: Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Connectedness. Number 90/8 in MPIFG Discussion paper. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schelling, T.: What is Game Theory? In: Choice and Consequence, pp. 213–242. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schütz, A., Luckmann, T.: Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Band 1, vol. 1, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schimank, U.: Gesellschaftliche Teilsysteme als Akteurfiktionen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 619–639 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berger Peter, L., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Esser, H.: Soziologie — Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 5: Institutionen, vol. 5, Campus, Frankfurt/M (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W.: Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W. (eds.) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, pp. 39–72. Campus, Frankfurt/M (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Powell, W., Maggio, P. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  30. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The Iron Cage Revisited. American Sociological Review, 147–160 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Granovetter, M.: Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 1420–1443 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elster, J.: The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Hedström, P.: Rational Imitation. In: Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 306–327. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsebelis, G.: Nested Games. In: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, University of California Press, Berkeley (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jansen, D.: Analyse sozialer Netzwerke. Leske + Budrich, Opladen (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., Menzel, H.: Medical Innovation. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Snow, D., Zurcher, L., Ekeland-Olsen, S.: Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment. American Sociological Review, 787–801 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Granovetter, M.: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1360–1380 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weise, P.: Homo oeconomicus und homo sociologicus. Die Schreckensmänner der Sozialwissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 148–161 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schimank, U.: Hochschulforschung im Schatten der Lehre. Campus, Frankfurt/M (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kehm, B.M.: Universitätskrisen im Spiegel von Hochschulromanen. In: Stölting, E., Schimank, U., eds.: Die Krise der Universität. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, Leviathan Sonderheft 20/2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G.: Leadership and Ambiguity. In: The American College President. McGraw Hill, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  45. March, J.G., Simon, H.: Organizations. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schelling, T.: Economic Reasoning and the Ethics of Policy. In: Choice and Consequence, pp. 1–26. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Axelrod, R.: An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. American Potitical Science Review, 1095–1111 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bachmann, R.: Kooperation, Vertrauen und Macht in Systemen Verteilter Künstlicher Intelligenz. In: Malsch, T. (ed.) Sozionik — Soziologische Ansichten über künstliche Sozialität, pp. 197–234. Sigma, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schimank, U. (2005). From “Clean” Mechanisms to “Dirty” Models: Methodological Perspectives of an Up-Scaling of Actor Constellations. In: Fischer, K., Florian, M., Malsch, T. (eds) Socionics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31613-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics