Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Socionics pp 176–198Cite as

Trust and the Economy of Symbolic Goods: A Contribution to the Scalability of Open Multi-agent Systems

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3413))

Abstract

Today, the importance of trust to issues of social coordination seems to be largely accepted in Distributed AI and sociology. This paper suggests a sociological multi-level concept of trust to provide suitable solutions to problems of large-scale open multi-agent systems (MAS). For this purpose, we firstly analyze DAI concepts dealing with the notion of trust and examine effects of trust on the scalability of MAS. We argue that trust itself must be modeled as a social mechanism that allows the scaling up of agent coordination in open MAS. Secondly, we summarize sociological conceptions of trust and outline problems concerning the build-up and diffusion of trust from a sociological perspective. Finally, we introduce a multi-level approach to trust by referring to sociologist Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of the economy of symbolic goods including basic social mechanisms in order to cope with the coordination of large numbers of heterogeneous agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hewitt, C.E.: The challenge of open systems. Byte 10, 223–242 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hewitt, C.E.: Open Information Systems Semantics for Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 47, 79–106 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuman, B.: Scale in distributed systems. In: Casavant, T., Singhal, M. (eds.) Readings in Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 463–489. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wijngaards, N., Overeinder, B., Steen, M.v., Brazier, F.: Supporting Internet-Scale Multi-Agent Systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering 41, 229–245 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, P., Jennings, N.: Improving the Scalability of Multi-agent Systems. In: Wagner, T., Rana, O. (eds.) Infrastructure for Agent, Multi-Agent Systems, and Scalable Multi-Agent Systems, Berlin, pp. 246–262 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durfee, E.: Scaling Up Agent Coordination Strategies. IEEE Computer 34, 39–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber, C.: Self-Adaptation and Scalability inMulti-Agent Societies. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rana, O., Stout, K.: What is scalability in Multi-Agent Systems? In: Sierra, C., Gini, M., Rosenschein, J.S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, pp. 56–63. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidsson, P.: Categories of Artificial Societies. In: Omicini, A., Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R. (eds.) ESAW 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2203, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidsson, P.: Emergent Societies of Information Agents. In: Klusch, M., Kerschberg, L. (eds.) CIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1860, pp. 143–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramchurn, S., Sierra, G.L., Jennings, N.: A Computational Trust Model for Multi-Agent Interactions based on Confidence and Reputation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 69–75 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y., Falcone, R., Firozabadi, B. (eds.): Special Issue on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies. Part 2. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal 14 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y. (eds.): Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y., Falcone, R., Firozabadi, B. (eds.): Special Issue on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies. Part 1. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal 14 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falcone, R., Singh, M., Tan, Y. (eds.): AA-WS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2246. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schillo, M., Bürckert, H., Fischer, K., Klusch, M.: Towards a Definition of Robustness for Market-Style Open Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AA 2001), pp. 75–76 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schillo, M., Rovatsos, M., Funk, P.: Using Trust for Detecting Deceitful Agents in Artificial Societies. [14] 825–848

    Google Scholar 

  18. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: The Socio-cognitive Dynamics of Trust. Does Trust Create Trust? [15] 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  19. Coleman, J.: Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luhmann, N.: Trust and Power. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust and Control. A Dialectic Link. [14] 799–823

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bourdieu, P.: Delegation and Political Fetishism. Thesis Eleven, 56–70 (1984/1985)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giddens, A.: The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh, S.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis, University of Stirling, Department of Computing Science (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abdul-Rahman, A., Hailes, S.: Supporting Trust in Virtual Communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, vol. 6, Maui, Hawaii. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000), http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/06/04936007.pdf

  26. Birk, A.: Learning to Trust. [15] 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust based on Experiences. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 221–232. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, S., Singh, M.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2002, Bologna, Italy, pp. 294–301. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Venkatraman, M., Yu, S., Singh, M.: Trust and Reputation Management in a Small-World Network (Poster). In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, ICMAS-2000, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 449–450. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000), http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/icmas/2000/0625/00/06250449abs.htm

  30. Metzger, J., Schillo, M., Fischer, K.: A multiagent-based peer-to-peer network in java for distributed spam filtering. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 616–625. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sandip, S.: Reciprocity: A foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multiagent Systems, ICMAS 1996, pp. 322–329. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Is Much More than Subjective Probability. Mental Components and Sources of Trust. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, vol. 6. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000), http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/06/04936008.pdf

  34. Luhmann, N.: Confidence, Trust. Problems and Alternatives. In: Gambetta, D., ed.: Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Electronic edn. 94–107 (2000), http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/gambetta213-237.pdf

  35. Gasser, L.: Social Conceptions of Knowledge and Action. DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics. Artificial Intelligence 47, 107–138 (1991)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Bachmann, R.: Kooperation, Vertrauen und Macht in Systemen Verteilter Künstlicher Intelligenz. Eine Vorstudie zum Verhältnis von soziologischer Theorie und technischer Modellierung. In: Malsch, T. (ed.) Sozionik - Soziologische Ansichtenüber künstliche Sozialität, pp. 197–234. Sigma, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gambetta, D.: ’Can We Trust Trust?’. In: Gambetta, D., ed.: Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Electronic edn, pp. 213–237 (2000), http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/gambetta213-237.pdf

  38. Münch, R.: Rational Choice - Grenzen der Erklärungskraft. In: Müller, H.P., Schmid, M. (eds.) Norm, Herrschaft und Vertrauen. Beiträge zu James S. Colemans Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie, pp. 79–91. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Wiesbaden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Popitz, H.: Die normative Konstruktion der Gesellschaft. Mohr, Tübingen (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zucker, L.G.: Production of Trust. Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 53–111 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Granovetter, M.: Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. In: Nohira, N., Eccles, R.G. (eds.) Networks and Organizations. Structure, Form, and Action, pp. 25–56. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bourdieu, P.: Selections from The Logic of Practice. In: Schrift, A.D. (ed.) The Logic of the Gift. Toward an Ethic of Generosity, pp. 190–230. Routledge, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bourdieu, P.: Pascalian Meditations. Polity Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bourdieu, P.: The (three) Forms of Capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. Greenwood Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L.: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schillo, M., Fischer, K., Fley, B., Florian, M., Hillebrandt, F., Spresny, D.: FORM – A sociologically founded framework for designing self-organization of multiagent systems. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Paolucci, M. (eds.) RASTA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2934, pp. 156–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Schillo, M., Fischer, K., Hillebrandt, F., Florian, M., Dederichs, A.: Bounded social rationality. Modelling self-organization and adaptation using habitus-field theory. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Modelling Artificial Societies and Hybrid Organizations, MASHO 2000, pp. 112–122 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bourdieu, P.: In OtherWords. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. University Press/Polity Press, Stanford/Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstrasse 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Bettina Fley & Michael Florian

Authors
  1. Bettina Fley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Florian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DFKI GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Klaus Fischer

  2. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstrasse 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Michael Florian

  3. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Thomas Malsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fley, B., Florian, M. (2005). Trust and the Economy of Symbolic Goods: A Contribution to the Scalability of Open Multi-agent Systems. In: Fischer, K., Florian, M., Malsch, T. (eds) Socionics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31613-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation