Action Planning for Virtual Human Performances

  • Markus Löckelt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3805)


We describe an action planning approach that integrates a system of autonomous dialogue engines with narration and presentation modules to create a multi-modal storytelling environment. The goal is to let multiple virtual and human participants act on equal footing in a story that allows interactions that are flexible, but also constrained to ensure the success of the narrative goals. The model allows to combine scripted and planned behavior. The state of the story goals is continuously reflected to the narration module to allow it a fine-grained control over the development of the story.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A.: HCRC Dialogue Structure Coding Manual, Universities of Edinburgh and Glasgow (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Göbel, S., Schneider, O., Iurgel, I., Feix, A., Knöpfle, C., Rettig, A.: VirtualHuman: Storytelling and Computer Graphics for a Virtual Human Platform. In: Göbel, S., Spierling, U., Hoffmann, A., Iurgel, I., Schneider, O., Dechau, J., Feix, A. (eds.) TIDSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3105, pp. 79–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hulstijn, J.: Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction, PhD thesis, University of Twente, Sweden (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hulstijn, J.: Dialogue Games are Recipes for Joint Action. In: Proceedings of Gotalog Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues, Gothenburg, Sweden (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langer, M., Hülsken, F., Eckes, C.: Evaluation des T24-Demonstrators im BMBF-Forschungsprojekt “Virtual Human”, Technical Report 3, Fraunhofer-Institut für Medienkommunikation, St. Augustin, unpublished (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Löckelt, M., Pfleger, N.: Multi-Party Interaction With Self-Contained Virtual Characters. In: Proceedings of the DIALOR workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, LORIA, Nancy, France, pp. 139–143 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mateas, M.: Interactive Drama, Art, and Artificial Intelligence. PhD Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues Between Autonomous Agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11(3), 315–334 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Informal Logic, Special Issue on Applications of Argumentation in Computer Science (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pfleger, N., Löckelt, M.: Synchronizing Dialogue Contributions of Human Users and Virtual Characters in a Virtual Reality Environment. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (INTERSPEECH), Lissabon, Portugal (2005) (to appear)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riedl, M.O., Young, R.M.: Character-Focused Narrative Planning for Execution in Virtual Worlds. In: Balet, O., Subsol, G., Torguet, P. (eds.) ICVS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2897, pp. 47–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Löckelt
    • 1
  1. 1.DFKI GmbHSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations